BAHELIM SHAHRUKHKHAN (SARAKKHAN) RAHEBARALIKHAN vs Government of Gujarat — 126/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483,. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 07th March 2026.

CRMA S

CNR: GJMH150003142026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

126/2026

Filing Date

02-03-2026

Registration No

126/2026

Registration Date

02-03-2026

Court

ADDL. DISTRICT COURT, VISNAGAR

Judge

5-3rd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE

Decision Date

07th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Acts & Sections

THE BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023 Section 483,

Petitioner(s)

BAHELIM SHAHRUKHKHAN (SARAKKHAN) RAHEBARALIKHAN

Adv. M S MEMAN

Respondent(s)

Government of Gujarat

Hearing History

Judge: 5-3rd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE

07-03-2026

Disposed

06-03-2026

PROCESS TO RESPONDENTS

05-03-2026

PROCESS TO RESPONDENTS

Final Orders / Judgements

07-03-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Court Decision Summary The Additional Sessions Court, Visnagar (Gujarat) granted regular bail to the accused Bahelim Shahrukhkhan in a case involving slaughter of cattle and violation of animal protection laws. The court found that while serious charges exist under IPC Section 325 and the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, the accused's lack of direct involvement at the crime scene, weak circumstantial evidence, acquittal in a similar prior case, and his status as a local laborer with family dependents warranted bail with conditions including a surety bond of ₹25,000 and regular police station reporting. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The Additional Sessions Court, Visnagar (Gujarat) granted regular bail to the accused Bahelim Shahrukhkhan in a case involving slaughter of cattle and violation of animal protection laws. The court found that while serious charges exist under IPC Section 325 and the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, the accused's lack of direct involvement at the crime scene, weak circumstantial evidence, acquittal in a similar prior case, and his status as a local laborer with family dependents warranted bail with conditions including a surety bond of ₹25,000 and regular police station reporting. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

ADDL. DISTRICT COURT, VISNAGAR All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case