BAHELIM SHAHRUKHKHAN (SARAKKHAN) RAHEBARALIKHAN vs Government of Gujarat — 126/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 07th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRMA S

CNR: GJMH150003142026

Filing Number

126/2026

Filing Date

02-Mar-2026

Registration No

126/2026

Registration Date

02-Mar-2026

Court

ADDL. DISTRICT COURT, VISNAGAR

Judge

5-3rd Addl District Judge

Decision Date

07-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 21-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BAHELIM SHAHRUKHKHAN (SARAKKHAN) RAHEBARALIKHAN

    Adv. M S MEMAN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-Mar-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Court Decision Summary The Additional Sessions Court, Visnagar (Gujarat) granted regular bail to the accused Bahelim Shahrukhkhan in a case involving slaughter of cattle and violation of animal protection laws. The court found that while serious charges exist under IPC Section 325 and the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, the accused's lack of direct involvement at the crime scene, weak circumstantial evidence, acquittal in a similar prior case, and his status as a local laborer with family dependents warranted bail with conditions including a surety bond of ₹25,000 and regular police station reporting. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    3rd Addl District Judge

  4. 06-Mar-2026

    Process To Respondents

    3rd Addl District Judge

  5. 05-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 02-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 126/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The Additional Sessions Court, Visnagar (Gujarat) granted regular bail to the accused Bahelim Shahrukhkhan in a case involving slaughter of cattle and violation of animal protection laws. The court found that while serious charges exist under IPC Section 325 and the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, the accused's lack of direct involvement at the crime scene, weak circumstantial evidence, acquittal in a similar prior case, and his status as a local laborer with family dependents warranted bail with conditions including a surety bond of ₹25,000 and regular police station reporting. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case