BAHELIM SHAHRUKHKHAN (SARAKKHAN) RAHEBARALIKHAN vs Government of Gujarat — 126/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483,. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 07th March 2026.
CRMA S
CNR: GJMH150003142026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
126/2026
Filing Date
02-03-2026
Registration No
126/2026
Registration Date
02-03-2026
Court
ADDL. DISTRICT COURT, VISNAGAR
Judge
5-3rd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Decision Date
07th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
BAHELIM SHAHRUKHKHAN (SARAKKHAN) RAHEBARALIKHAN
Adv. M S MEMAN
Respondent(s)
Government of Gujarat
Hearing History
Judge: 5-3rd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Disposed
PROCESS TO RESPONDENTS
PROCESS TO RESPONDENTS
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 07-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 06-03-2026 | PROCESS TO RESPONDENTS | |
| 05-03-2026 | PROCESS TO RESPONDENTS |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary The Additional Sessions Court, Visnagar (Gujarat) granted regular bail to the accused Bahelim Shahrukhkhan in a case involving slaughter of cattle and violation of animal protection laws. The court found that while serious charges exist under IPC Section 325 and the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, the accused's lack of direct involvement at the crime scene, weak circumstantial evidence, acquittal in a similar prior case, and his status as a local laborer with family dependents warranted bail with conditions including a surety bond of ₹25,000 and regular police station reporting. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Decision Summary The Additional Sessions Court, Visnagar (Gujarat) granted regular bail to the accused Bahelim Shahrukhkhan in a case involving slaughter of cattle and violation of animal protection laws. The court found that while serious charges exist under IPC Section 325 and the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, the accused's lack of direct involvement at the crime scene, weak circumstantial evidence, acquittal in a similar prior case, and his status as a local laborer with family dependents warranted bail with conditions including a surety bond of ₹25,000 and regular police station reporting. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts