THAKOR LALAJI RAMANJI vs BAHELIM MAHAMMAD AZAJ GULAMRASUL — 31/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 415(3). Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CR A - CRIMINAL APPEAL

CNR: GJMH150001632026

Filing Number

31/2026

Filing Date

04-Feb-2026

Registration No

31/2026

Registration Date

04-Feb-2026

Court

ADDL. DISTRICT COURT, VISNAGAR

Judge

4-Addl. District Judge

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--LOK ADALAT

Last updated 21-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 415(3)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THAKOR LALAJI RAMANJI

    Adv. D G PRAJAPATI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.BAHELIM MAHAMMAD AZAJ GULAMRASUL

  2. 2.Government of Gujarat

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Summary The Mehsana Additional Sessions Court allowed the criminal appeal of Thakore Lalaji Ramnji under Section 415(3) CrPC, acquitting him of charges under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The court considered a settlement reached between the appellant/accused and the complainant, where the full cheque amount of ₹90,000 was recovered, and set aside the trial court's conviction imposing 12 months imprisonment and fine. The appellant was declared not guilty and discharged. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addl. District Judge

  4. 06-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    Addl. District Judge

  5. 13-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 04-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 31/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Mehsana Additional Sessions Court allowed the criminal appeal of Thakore Lalaji Ramnji under Section 415(3) CrPC, acquitting him of charges under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The court considered a settlement reached between the appellant/accused and the complainant, where the full cheque amount of ₹90,000 was recovered, and set aside the trial court's conviction imposing 12 months imprisonment and fine. The appellant was declared not guilty and discharged. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case