MANOJ PRAVINCHANDRA GOTHI vs PATAN JAIN BHOJAN SHALA — 40/2025

Case under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 33. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 17th March 2026.

Case disposed

RECO33C1 LC - Recovery 33C (1)

CNR: GJMH140006222025

Filing Number

40/2025

Filing Date

20-Dec-2025

Registration No

40/2025

Registration Date

20-Dec-2025

Court

LABOUR COURT, MAHESANA

Judge

1-Judge, Labour Court

Decision Date

17-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED

Last updated 13-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 33

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MANOJ PRAVINCHANDRA GOTHI

    Adv. M H THAKER

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.PATAN JAIN BHOJAN SHALA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Mar-2026

    Judegement

    Court Decision Summary The Principal District Court of Mehsana (Gujarat) upheld a Revenue Officer's order under the Industrial Disputes Act, Section 33-C(1), directing an employer institution to pay an employee Rs. 2,99,938 in back wages for the period from 1.11.2022 to 31.10.2024 and Rs. 5,000 in case expenses. The court found the employer failed to comply with the original order, provided no evidence of payment, and filed no appeal or relief application, making recovery through a Revenue Certificate mandatory. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Judge, Labour Court

  4. 07-Mar-2026

    For Order

    Judge, Labour Court

  5. 16-Feb-2026

    For Notice Serve to opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  6. 28-Jan-2026

    For Notice Serve to opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  7. 12-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 20-Dec-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 40/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The Principal District Court of Mehsana (Gujarat) upheld a Revenue Officer's order under the Industrial Disputes Act, Section 33-C(1), directing an employer institution to pay an employee Rs. 2,99,938 in back wages for the period from 1.11.2022 to 31.10.2024 and Rs. 5,000 in case expenses. The court found the employer failed to comply with the original order, provided no evidence of payment, and filed no appeal or relief application, making recovery through a Revenue Certificate mandatory. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case