D. R. PARMAR, GOVT LABOUR OFFICER AND GRATUITY PAYMENT INSPECTOR vs DR. KRUPA RAVAL, GUJARAT VIKAS GROUP C/O BHAGYODAY MULTI SPECIALITY HOSPITAL KADI Advocate - H P MAKWANA — 232/2025
Case under The Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 Section 9. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 16th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJMH140004152025
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
232/2025
Filing Date
16-10-2025
Registration No
232/2025
Registration Date
28-10-2025
Court
LABOUR COURT, MAHESANA
Judge
1-JUDGE, LABOUR COURT
Decision Date
16th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
D. R. PARMAR, GOVT LABOUR OFFICER AND GRATUITY PAYMENT INSPECTOR
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
DR. KRUPA RAVAL, GUJARAT VIKAS GROUP C/O BHAGYODAY MULTI SPECIALITY HOSPITAL KADI Advocate - H P MAKWANA
RAJESHBHAI B. VAGHELA
Adv. H P MAKWANA
Hearing History
Judge: 1-JUDGE, LABOUR COURT
Disposed
PLEA
PLEA
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 16-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 14-03-2026 | PLEA | |
| 13-03-2026 | PLEA | |
| 07-03-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED | |
| 21-02-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate at Mehsana convicted the accused under Section 6(2) of the Payment of Gratuity Act (1972, 1987, 1993) for non-payment of gratuity to an employee. The court sentenced the accused to a fine of ₹5,000 with one month simple imprisonment in default, and imposed an additional fine of ₹10,000, considering the accused's first-time offense, family circumstances, and willingness to confess guilt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate at Mehsana convicted the accused under Section 6(2) of the Payment of Gratuity Act (1972, 1987, 1993) for non-payment of gratuity to an employee. The court sentenced the accused to a fine of ₹5,000 with one month simple imprisonment in default, and imposed an additional fine of ₹10,000, considering the accused's first-time offense, family circumstances, and willingness to confess guilt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts