VINUJI KHODAJI THAKOR vs CHIEF OFFICER SHRI, VISNAGAR NAGARPALIKA Advocate - V S TRIVEDI — 55/2017
Case under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 010,. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 17th March 2026.
REFER T LC - Referance T
CNR: GJMH140002922017
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
55/2017
Filing Date
26-10-2017
Registration No
55/2017
Registration Date
26-10-2017
Court
LABOUR COURT, MAHESANA
Judge
1-JUDGE, LABOUR COURT
Decision Date
17th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
VINUJI KHODAJI THAKOR
Adv. R K CHAUDHARY
Respondent(s)
CHIEF OFFICER SHRI, VISNAGAR NAGARPALIKA Advocate - V S TRIVEDI
Hearing History
Judge: 1-JUDGE, LABOUR COURT
Disposed
For award
For Argument of Second party
For Evidence of first party
For Evidence of first party
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 17-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 06-03-2026 | For award | |
| 24-02-2026 | For Argument of Second party | |
| 16-02-2026 | For Evidence of first party | |
| 28-01-2026 | For Evidence of first party |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The court rejected the worker's referral and dismissed his claim for reinstatement with back wages. The Labour Court found that the worker failed to produce documentary evidence to prove he was a permanent employee who worked 240+ days annually for 13 years at Visnagar Municipality, or that he was illegally terminated on 06/07/2017 without following due process under the Industrial Disputes Act. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court rejected the worker's referral and dismissed his claim for reinstatement with back wages. The Labour Court found that the worker failed to produce documentary evidence to prove he was a permanent employee who worked 240+ days annually for 13 years at Visnagar Municipality, or that he was illegally terminated on 06/07/2017 without following due process under the Industrial Disputes Act. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts