BABABHAI VIRSANGBHAI CHAUDHARI vs MANAGERSHRI, MAHESANA JILLA SAHAKARI DUDH UTPADAK SANGH LTD. Advocate - V S TRIVEDI — 26/2016
Case under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 033C,. Status: For Evidence of Applicant. Next hearing: 24th April 2026.
RECO33C2 LC - Recovery 33C (2)
CNR: GJMH140002302016
Next Hearing
24th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
26/2016
Filing Date
22-12-2016
Registration No
26/2016
Registration Date
22-12-2016
Court
LABOUR COURT, MAHESANA
Judge
1-JUDGE, LABOUR COURT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
BABABHAI VIRSANGBHAI CHAUDHARI
Adv. A R SHAHJADA
Respondent(s)
MANAGERSHRI, MAHESANA JILLA SAHAKARI DUDH UTPADAK SANGH LTD. Advocate - V S TRIVEDI
Hearing History
Judge: 1-JUDGE, LABOUR COURT
For Evidence of Applicant
For Evidence of opponent
For Evidence of opponent
For Evidence of opponent
For Evidence of opponent
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 07-04-2026 | For Evidence of Applicant | |
| 06-04-2026 | For Evidence of opponent | |
| 09-03-2026 | For Evidence of opponent | |
| 19-02-2026 | For Evidence of opponent | |
| 09-02-2026 | For Evidence of opponent |
Interim Orders
Summary The Mehsana Labour Court dismissed the worker's recovery petition filed under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, Section 33-C(2). The petitioner failed to provide documentary evidence to substantiate his claims of Rs. 3,59,443 with 12% simple interest against his former employer. The court held that the petitioner had not established his legal right to claim recovery and thus rejected the petition without costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Mehsana Labour Court dismissed the worker's recovery petition filed under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, Section 33-C(2). The petitioner failed to provide documentary evidence to substantiate his claims of Rs. 3,59,443 with 12% simple interest against his former employer. The court held that the petitioner had not established his legal right to claim recovery and thus rejected the petition without costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts