BABABHAI VIRSANGBHAI CHAUDHARI vs MANAGERSHRI, MAHESANA JILLA SAHAKARI DUDH UTPADAK SANGH LTD. Advocate - V S TRIVEDI — 26/2016

Case under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 033C. Status: For Evidence of Applicant. Next hearing: 24th April 2026.

For Evidence of Applicant Next hearing 24-Apr-2026 this date has passed

RECO33C2 LC - Recovery 33C (2)

CNR: GJMH140002302016

Filing Number

26/2016

Filing Date

22-Dec-2016

Registration No

26/2016

Registration Date

22-Dec-2016

Court

LABOUR COURT, MAHESANA

Judge

1-Judge, Labour Court

Last updated 16-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 033C

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BABABHAI VIRSANGBHAI CHAUDHARI

    Adv. A R SHAHJADA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MANAGERSHRI, MAHESANA JILLA SAHAKARI DUDH UTPADAK SANGH LTD. Advocate - V S TRIVEDI

Case History

  1. 24-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 07-Apr-2026

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  3. 06-Apr-2026

    For Evidence of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    For Evidence of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  5. 19-Feb-2026

    For Evidence of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  6. 09-Feb-2026

    For Evidence of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  7. 05-Jan-2026

    For Evidence of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  8. 08-Dec-2025

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  9. 10-Nov-2025

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  10. 13-Oct-2025

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  11. 22-Sep-2025

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  12. 22-Aug-2025

    Appellant's Evidence

    Judge, Labour Court

  13. 22-Aug-2025

    Restored

    Judge, Labour Court

  14. 17-Apr-2025

    OrderView PDF

    Summary The Mehsana Labour Court dismissed the worker's recovery petition filed under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, Section 33-C(2). The petitioner failed to provide documentary evidence to substantiate his claims of Rs. 3,59,443 with 12% simple interest against his former employer. The court held that the petitioner had not established his legal right to claim recovery and thus rejected the petition without costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  15. 17-Apr-2025

    Disposed

    Judge, Labour Court

  16. 13-Mar-2025

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  17. 06-Feb-2025

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  18. 09-Jan-2025

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  19. 14-Nov-2024

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  20. 05-Sep-2024

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  21. 18-Jul-2024

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  22. 13-Jun-2024

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  23. 02-May-2024

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  24. 21-Mar-2024

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  25. 01-Feb-2024

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  26. 21-Dec-2023

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  27. 02-Nov-2023

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  28. 21-Sep-2023

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  29. 27-Jul-2023

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  30. 01-Jun-2023

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  31. 13-Apr-2023

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  32. 23-Feb-2023

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  33. 12-Jan-2023

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  34. 08-Dec-2022

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  35. 03-Nov-2022

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  36. 22-Sep-2022

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  37. 25-Aug-2022

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  38. 14-Jul-2022

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  39. 09-Jun-2022

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  40. 05-May-2022

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  41. 24-Mar-2022

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  42. 10-Feb-2022

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  43. 30-Dec-2021

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  44. 25-Nov-2021

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  45. 07-Oct-2021

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  46. 02-Sep-2021

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  47. 22-Jul-2021

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  48. 03-Jun-2021

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  49. 25-Mar-2021

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  50. 28-Jan-2021

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  51. 03-Dec-2020

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  52. 01-Oct-2020

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  53. 06-Aug-2020

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  54. 11-Jun-2020

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  55. 09-Apr-2020

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  56. 19-Mar-2020

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  57. 09-Jan-2020

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  58. 07-Nov-2019

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  59. 12-Sep-2019

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  60. 11-Jul-2019

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  61. 30-May-2019

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  62. 04-Apr-2019

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  63. 31-Jan-2019

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  64. 20-Dec-2018

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  65. 15-Nov-2018

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  66. 20-Sep-2018

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  67. 26-Jul-2018

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  68. 24-May-2018

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  69. 19-Apr-2018

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  70. 15-Mar-2018

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  71. 11-Jan-2018

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  72. 09-Nov-2017

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  73. 07-Sep-2017

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  74. 13-Jul-2017

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  75. 25-May-2017

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  76. 23-Mar-2017

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  77. 02-Feb-2017

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  78. 22-Dec-2016

    Case filed

    Registration No. 26/2016

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Mehsana Labour Court dismissed the worker's recovery petition filed under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, Section 33-C(2). The petitioner failed to provide documentary evidence to substantiate his claims of Rs. 3,59,443 with 12% simple interest against his former employer. The court held that the petitioner had not established his legal right to claim recovery and thus rejected the petition without costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case