RAMESHBHAI MANGALDAS PATEL vs MANAGER SHRI, MAHESANA DISTRICT SAHKARI DUDH UTPADAK SANGH LTD. Advocate - V S TRIVEDI — 55/2017

Case under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 033C. Status: For Evidence of Applicant. Next hearing: 24th April 2026.

For Evidence of Applicant Next hearing 24-Apr-2026 this date has passed

RECO33C2 LC - Recovery 33C (2)

CNR: GJMH140001952017

Filing Number

55/2017

Filing Date

14-Sep-2017

Registration No

55/2017

Registration Date

14-Sep-2017

Court

LABOUR COURT, MAHESANA

Judge

1-Judge, Labour Court

Last updated 16-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 033C

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAMESHBHAI MANGALDAS PATEL

    Adv. A R SHAHJADA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MANAGER SHRI, MAHESANA DISTRICT SAHKARI DUDH UTPADAK SANGH LTD. Advocate - V S TRIVEDI

Case History

  1. 24-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 07-Apr-2026

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  3. 06-Apr-2026

    For Evidence of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    For Evidence of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  5. 19-Feb-2026

    For Evidence of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  6. 09-Feb-2026

    For Evidence of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  7. 05-Jan-2026

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  8. 08-Dec-2025

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  9. 10-Nov-2025

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  10. 13-Oct-2025

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  11. 22-Sep-2025

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  12. 22-Aug-2025

    Restored

    Judge, Labour Court

  13. 22-Aug-2025

    Evidence Of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  14. 17-Apr-2025

    OrderView PDF

    Case Summary The Labor Court of Mehsana dismissed the recovery petition filed by Rameshbhai Mangaldas Patel under Section 33-C(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. The petitioner sought recovery of Rs. 1,52,532 (comprising unemployment compensation of Rs. 1,41,392 and notice pay of Rs. 11,140) from his employer, Mehsana District Cooperative Milk Producers Union. The court found that the petitioner failed to substantiate his claims with documentary evidence and did not establish a valid legal right to pursue the recovery petition, hence dismissing the petition for lack of proof. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  15. 17-Apr-2025

    Disposed

    Judge, Labour Court

  16. 06-Mar-2025

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  17. 30-Jan-2025

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  18. 05-Dec-2024

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  19. 26-Sep-2024

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  20. 25-Jul-2024

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  21. 13-Jun-2024

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  22. 09-May-2024

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  23. 21-Mar-2024

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  24. 01-Feb-2024

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  25. 21-Dec-2023

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  26. 02-Nov-2023

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  27. 21-Sep-2023

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  28. 27-Jul-2023

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  29. 01-Jun-2023

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  30. 20-Apr-2023

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  31. 02-Mar-2023

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  32. 19-Jan-2023

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  33. 15-Dec-2022

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  34. 10-Nov-2022

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  35. 15-Sep-2022

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  36. 28-Jul-2022

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  37. 30-Jun-2022

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  38. 19-May-2022

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  39. 07-Apr-2022

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  40. 03-Mar-2022

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  41. 20-Jan-2022

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  42. 09-Dec-2021

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  43. 21-Oct-2021

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  44. 16-Sep-2021

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  45. 03-Aug-2021

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  46. 10-Jun-2021

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  47. 25-Mar-2021

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  48. 28-Jan-2021

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  49. 03-Dec-2020

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  50. 01-Oct-2020

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  51. 06-Aug-2020

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  52. 11-Jun-2020

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  53. 09-Apr-2020

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  54. 19-Mar-2020

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  55. 23-Jan-2020

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  56. 21-Nov-2019

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  57. 19-Sep-2019

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  58. 01-Aug-2019

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  59. 30-May-2019

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  60. 04-Apr-2019

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  61. 31-Jan-2019

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  62. 13-Dec-2018

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  63. 11-Oct-2018

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  64. 09-Aug-2018

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  65. 14-Jun-2018

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  66. 10-May-2018

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  67. 22-Mar-2018

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  68. 04-Jan-2018

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  69. 26-Oct-2017

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  70. 14-Sep-2017

    Case filed

    Registration No. 55/2017

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary The Labor Court of Mehsana dismissed the recovery petition filed by Rameshbhai Mangaldas Patel under Section 33-C(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. The petitioner sought recovery of Rs. 1,52,532 (comprising unemployment compensation of Rs. 1,41,392 and notice pay of Rs. 11,140) from his employer, Mehsana District Cooperative Milk Producers Union. The court found that the petitioner failed to substantiate his claims with documentary evidence and did not establish a valid legal right to pursue the recovery petition, hence dismissing the petition for lack of proof. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case