SHASHIKANT JYANTILAL MODI vs MANAGER SHRI, THE SARVODAY NAGRIK SAHKARI BANK LTD. Advocate - M C MODI — 144/2008
Case under Gujarat Industrial Relation Act, 1946 Section 078. Status: For Evidence of Applicant. Next hearing: 06th April 2026.
TAPP LC - Application for Termination
CNR: GJMH140001282008
Next Hearing
06th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
144/2008
Filing Date
12-06-2006
Registration No
144/2008
Registration Date
12-06-2006
Court
LABOUR COURT, MAHESANA
Judge
1-JUDGE, LABOUR COURT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SHASHIKANT JYANTILAL MODI
Adv. RAHUL A DAVE
Respondent(s)
MANAGER SHRI, THE SARVODAY NAGRIK SAHKARI BANK LTD. Advocate - M C MODI
Hearing History
Judge: 1-JUDGE, LABOUR COURT
For Evidence of Applicant
For Evidence of Applicant
For Evidence of Applicant
For Evidence of Applicant
For Evidence of Applicant
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 16-03-2026 | For Evidence of Applicant | |
| 06-03-2026 | For Evidence of Applicant | |
| 23-02-2026 | For Evidence of Applicant | |
| 16-02-2026 | For Evidence of Applicant | |
| 11-02-2026 | For Evidence of Applicant |
Interim Orders
Case Summary Order Outcome: Petition dismissed. The Labour Court of Mehsana rejected the petitioner's application (Under Section 19 of the B.I.R. Act) seeking to add the Liquidator as a second respondent in the case. The court held that since the cooperative bank has entered liquidation proceedings under the Gujarat Co-operative Societies Act, the petitioner must first obtain prior permission from the Registrar before pursuing any legal action against the liquidator, as required under Section 112 of the Act. Since the petitioner failed to obtain such permission, the court could not allow adding the liquidator as a party. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary Order Outcome: Petition dismissed. The Labour Court of Mehsana rejected the petitioner's application (Under Section 19 of the B.I.R. Act) seeking to add the Liquidator as a second respondent in the case. The court held that since the cooperative bank has entered liquidation proceedings under the Gujarat Co-operative Societies Act, the petitioner must first obtain prior permission from the Registrar before pursuing any legal action against the liquidator, as required under Section 112 of the Act. Since the petitioner failed to obtain such permission, the court could not allow adding the liquidator as a party. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts