GURUPITSING JAYRAM vs McCAIN FOOD INDIA PVT. LTD. Advocate - H C NAIDU — 36/2016
Case under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 010,. Status: For Evidence of Second party. Next hearing: 10th April 2026.
REFER T LC - Referance T
CNR: GJMH140001232016
Next Hearing
10th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
36/2016
Filing Date
01-08-2016
Registration No
36/2016
Registration Date
01-08-2016
Court
LABOUR COURT, MAHESANA
Judge
1-JUDGE, LABOUR COURT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
GURUPITSING JAYRAM
Adv. A N PATEL
Respondent(s)
McCAIN FOOD INDIA PVT. LTD. Advocate - H C NAIDU
Hearing History
Judge: 1-JUDGE, LABOUR COURT
For Evidence of Second party
For Evidence of Second party
For Evidence of Second party
For Evidence of Second party
Restored
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 17-03-2026 | For Evidence of Second party | |
| 06-03-2026 | For Evidence of Second party | |
| 12-02-2026 | For Evidence of Second party | |
| 02-02-2026 | For Evidence of Second party | |
| 02-02-2026 | Restored |
Interim Orders
Case Summary The Mehsana Labour Court dismissed the reference petition filed by employee Gurpitsingh Jayram against McCann Food India Pvt. Ltd. The court found that the employee failed to substantiate his claims of wrongful termination on April 23, 2016, through written or oral evidence, and consequently rejected his plea for reinstatement with back wages and continuous service benefits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary The Mehsana Labour Court dismissed the reference petition filed by employee Gurpitsingh Jayram against McCann Food India Pvt. Ltd. The court found that the employee failed to substantiate his claims of wrongful termination on April 23, 2016, through written or oral evidence, and consequently rejected his plea for reinstatement with back wages and continuous service benefits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts