BHAVSINH LAVJIBHAI THAKOR vs ST BUS GSRTC DEPARTMENT, MAHESANA Advocate - P A GANDHI — 24/2025
Case under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 10,. Disposed: Uncontested--COMPROMISE AFTER RECORDING EVIDENCE on 14th March 2026.
REFER T LC - Referance T
CNR: GJMH140001012025
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
24/2025
Filing Date
16-04-2025
Registration No
24/2025
Registration Date
13-05-2025
Court
LABOUR COURT, MAHESANA
Judge
1-JUDGE, LABOUR COURT
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--COMPROMISE AFTER RECORDING EVIDENCE
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
BHAVSINH LAVJIBHAI THAKOR
Adv. J L RAVAL
Respondent(s)
ST BUS GSRTC DEPARTMENT, MAHESANA Advocate - P A GANDHI
Hearing History
Judge: 1-JUDGE, LABOUR COURT
Disposed
For Evidence of Second party
For Evidence of Second party
For Evidence of Second party
For Evidence of Second party
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 10-03-2026 | For Evidence of Second party | |
| 10-02-2026 | For Evidence of Second party | |
| 13-01-2026 | For Evidence of Second party | |
| 09-12-2025 | For Evidence of Second party |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Labour Court of Mehsana approved a settlement agreement between the ST Department (first party) and employee Bhavsinh Lavjibhai Thakor (second party) under the ID Act Section 10(1)(c). The court awarded that the employee shall be reinstated to his original position with back wages for the period of absence, along with one year of salary suspension and all financial benefits calculated as notional fictitious, with no further claims remaining outstanding between the parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Labour Court of Mehsana approved a settlement agreement between the ST Department (first party) and employee Bhavsinh Lavjibhai Thakor (second party) under the ID Act Section 10(1)(c). The court awarded that the employee shall be reinstated to his original position with back wages for the period of absence, along with one year of salary suspension and all financial benefits calculated as notional fictitious, with no further claims remaining outstanding between the parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts