N. SHRIDHARA, LABOUR INFORCEMENT OFFICER AND INSPECTOR vs SUBHASH AGARWALLA S/O SHRI HANSRAJ AGARWALLA Advocate - A D TRIVEDI — 34/2025
Case under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 29,. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJMH140000692025
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
34/2025
Filing Date
15-04-2025
Registration No
34/2025
Registration Date
15-04-2025
Court
LABOUR COURT, MAHESANA
Judge
1-JUDGE, LABOUR COURT
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
N. SHRIDHARA, LABOUR INFORCEMENT OFFICER AND INSPECTOR
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
SUBHASH AGARWALLA S/O SHRI HANSRAJ AGARWALLA Advocate - A D TRIVEDI
Hearing History
Judge: 1-JUDGE, LABOUR COURT
Disposed
PLEA
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 07-03-2026 | PLEA | |
| 21-02-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED | |
| 31-01-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED | |
| 03-01-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate of Mehsana Labor Court convicted Subhash Agarwal under the Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970 and Gujarat Rules, 1972 for violating multiple provisions including Rules 81(2), 25(2), 82(1), 78(1), among others related to contract labor regulations. The accused, who pleaded guilty and expressed remorse, was sentenced to pay a fine of ₹4,000 (₹500 per violation) with one month simple imprisonment as an alternative in default of fine payment, with a direction to deposit the fine with the government. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate of Mehsana Labor Court convicted Subhash Agarwal under the Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970 and Gujarat Rules, 1972 for violating multiple provisions including Rules 81(2), 25(2), 82(1), 78(1), among others related to contract labor regulations. The accused, who pleaded guilty and expressed remorse, was sentenced to pay a fine of ₹4,000 (₹500 per violation) with one month simple imprisonment as an alternative in default of fine payment, with a direction to deposit the fine with the government. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts