N. SHRIDHARA, LABOUR INFORCEMENT OFFICER AND INSPECTOR vs SUBHASH AGARWALLA S/O SHRI HANSRAJ AGARWALLA Advocate - A D TRIVEDI — 34/2025

Case under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 29,. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJMH140000692025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

34/2025

Filing Date

15-04-2025

Registration No

34/2025

Registration Date

15-04-2025

Court

LABOUR COURT, MAHESANA

Judge

1-JUDGE, LABOUR COURT

Decision Date

14th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Acts & Sections

INDUSTRIAL DISPUTES ACT, 1947 Section 29,

Petitioner(s)

N. SHRIDHARA, LABOUR INFORCEMENT OFFICER AND INSPECTOR

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

SUBHASH AGARWALLA S/O SHRI HANSRAJ AGARWALLA Advocate - A D TRIVEDI

Hearing History

Judge: 1-JUDGE, LABOUR COURT

14-03-2026

Disposed

07-03-2026

PLEA

21-02-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

31-01-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

03-01-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

Final Orders / Judgements

14-03-2026
JUDEGEMENT

The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate of Mehsana Labor Court convicted Subhash Agarwal under the Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970 and Gujarat Rules, 1972 for violating multiple provisions including Rules 81(2), 25(2), 82(1), 78(1), among others related to contract labor regulations. The accused, who pleaded guilty and expressed remorse, was sentenced to pay a fine of ₹4,000 (₹500 per violation) with one month simple imprisonment as an alternative in default of fine payment, with a direction to deposit the fine with the government. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate of Mehsana Labor Court convicted Subhash Agarwal under the Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970 and Gujarat Rules, 1972 for violating multiple provisions including Rules 81(2), 25(2), 82(1), 78(1), among others related to contract labor regulations. The accused, who pleaded guilty and expressed remorse, was sentenced to pay a fine of ₹4,000 (₹500 per violation) with one month simple imprisonment as an alternative in default of fine payment, with a direction to deposit the fine with the government. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

LABOUR COURT, MAHESANA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case