ASHOKBHAI KESHAVLAL VYAS vs DEPUTY EXECUTIVE ENGINEER SHRI, PATAN CANAL SUB DIVISION Advocate - P A GANDHI — 15/2020

Case under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 10. Disposed: Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED on 25th March 2026.

Case disposed

REFER T LC - Referance T

CNR: GJMH140000362020

Filing Number

15/2020

Filing Date

17-Jul-2020

Registration No

15/2020

Registration Date

17-Jul-2020

Court

LABOUR COURT, MAHESANA

Judge

1-Judge, Labour Court

Decision Date

25-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED

Last updated 05-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 10

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ASHOKBHAI KESHAVLAL VYAS

    Adv. A R SHAHJADA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.DEPUTY EXECUTIVE ENGINEER SHRI, PATAN CANAL SUB DIVISION Advocate - P A GANDHI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 25-Mar-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Summary The court ruled that the employer's termination of the daily-wage worker on 31/05/1999 was illegal and violated labor law procedures. However, instead of ordering reinstatement after 21 years of delay, the court awarded compensation of ₹50,000 plus 6% interest and ₹5,000 case costs, citing established precedent that monetary relief is more appropriate for delayed claims by daily-wage workers. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 25-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Judge, Labour Court

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    For award

    Judge, Labour Court

  5. 24-Feb-2026

    For Argument of Second party

    Judge, Labour Court

  6. 10-Feb-2026

    For Evidence of first party

    Judge, Labour Court

  7. 06-Jan-2026

    For Evidence of first party

    Judge, Labour Court

  8. 02-Dec-2025

    For Evidence of first party

    Judge, Labour Court

  9. 20-Nov-2025

    For Evidence of first party

    Judge, Labour Court

  10. 30-Oct-2025

    For Evidence of first party

    Judge, Labour Court

  11. 09-Oct-2025

    For Evidence of first party

    Judge, Labour Court

  12. 16-Sep-2025

    For Evidence of first party

    Judge, Labour Court

  13. 05-Aug-2025

    For Evidence of first party

    Judge, Labour Court

  14. 10-Jul-2025

    For Evidence of Second party

    Judge, Labour Court

  15. 05-Jun-2025

    For Evidence of Second party

    Judge, Labour Court

  16. 08-May-2025

    For Evidence of Second party

    Judge, Labour Court

  17. 17-Apr-2025

    For Evidence of Second party

    Judge, Labour Court

  18. 06-Mar-2025

    For Evidence of Second party

    Judge, Labour Court

  19. 30-Jan-2025

    For Evidence of Second party

    Judge, Labour Court

  20. 16-Jan-2025

    For Evidence of Second party

    Judge, Labour Court

  21. 21-Nov-2024

    For Evidence of Second party

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  22. 19-Sep-2024

    For Evidence of Second party

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  23. 18-Jul-2024

    For Evidence of Second party

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  24. 06-Jun-2024

    For Evidence of Second party

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  25. 25-Apr-2024

    For Evidence of Second party

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  26. 14-Mar-2024

    For Evidence of Second party

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  27. 25-Jan-2024

    For Evidence of Second party

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  28. 21-Dec-2023

    For w.s. of First party

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  29. 19-Oct-2023

    For w.s. of First party

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  30. 31-Aug-2023

    For w.s. of First party

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  31. 13-Jul-2023

    For w.s. of First party

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  32. 25-May-2023

    For w.s. of First party

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  33. 06-Apr-2023

    For w.s. of First party

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  34. 16-Feb-2023

    For w.s. of First party

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  35. 07-Jan-2023

    For w.s. of First party

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  36. 17-Dec-2022

    For w.s. of First party

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  37. 03-Dec-2022

    For w.s. of First party

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  38. 19-Nov-2022

    For w.s. of First party

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  39. 15-Oct-2022

    For w.s. of First party

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  40. 08-Oct-2022

    For w.s. of First party

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  41. 17-Sep-2022

    For w.s. of First party

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  42. 20-Aug-2022

    For w.s. of First party

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  43. 30-Jul-2022

    For w.s. of First party

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  44. 28-Jul-2022

    For w.s. of First party

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  45. 16-Jun-2022

    For w.s. of First party

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  46. 12-May-2022

    For w.s. of First party

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  47. 31-Mar-2022

    For w.s. of First party

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  48. 17-Feb-2022

    For w.s. of First party

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  49. 06-Jan-2022

    For w.s. of First party

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  50. 02-Dec-2021

    For w.s. of First party

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  51. 14-Oct-2021

    For Notice Serve to both partys

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  52. 09-Sep-2021

    For Notice Serve to both partys

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  53. 22-Jul-2021

    For Notice Serve to both partys

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  54. 20-May-2021

    For Notice Serve to both partys

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  55. 04-Mar-2021

    For Notice Serve to both partys

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  56. 07-Jan-2021

    For Notice Serve to both partys

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  57. 09-Dec-2020

    For Notice Serve to both partys

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  58. 23-Oct-2020

    For Notice Serve to both partys

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  59. 25-Sep-2020

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  60. 17-Jul-2020

    Case filed

    Registration No. 15/2020

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court ruled that the employer's termination of the daily-wage worker on 31/05/1999 was illegal and violated labor law procedures. However, instead of ordering reinstatement after 21 years of delay, the court awarded compensation of ₹50,000 plus 6% interest and ₹5,000 case costs, citing established precedent that monetary relief is more appropriate for delayed claims by daily-wage workers. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case