A.S.SANGHVI, INSPECTOR OF INSPECTION OF BUILDING AND CONTRUCTION vs JASHBIR JUGALRAM YADAV Advocate - V S TRIVEDI — 12/2025

Case under The Building and Other Construction Workers (regulation of Employment and Conditions of Service) Act, 1996 Section 47,. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJMH140000282025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

12/2025

Filing Date

26-04-2024

Registration No

12/2025

Registration Date

26-04-2024

Court

LABOUR COURT, MAHESANA

Judge

1-JUDGE, LABOUR COURT

Decision Date

14th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Acts & Sections

THE BUILDING AND OTHER CONSTRUCTION WORKERS (REGULATION OF EMPLOYMENT AND CONDITIONS OF SERVICE) ACT, 1996 Section 47,

Petitioner(s)

A.S.SANGHVI, INSPECTOR OF INSPECTION OF BUILDING AND CONTRUCTION

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

JASHBIR JUGALRAM YADAV Advocate - V S TRIVEDI

Hearing History

Judge: 1-JUDGE, LABOUR COURT

14-03-2026

Disposed

13-03-2026

PLEA

07-03-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

21-02-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

31-01-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

Final Orders / Judgements

14-03-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Case Summary The court found the accused guilty of violating Rule 55(1) of the Gujarat Building and Other Construction Rules, 2003 under the Building and Other Construction Works Act, 1996. The accused voluntarily confessed to the offense without coercion. The court convicted the accused and sentenced him to pay a fine of ₹2,000, with one month simple imprisonment as default punishment if the fine remains unpaid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary The court found the accused guilty of violating Rule 55(1) of the Gujarat Building and Other Construction Rules, 2003 under the Building and Other Construction Works Act, 1996. The accused voluntarily confessed to the offense without coercion. The court convicted the accused and sentenced him to pay a fine of ₹2,000, with one month simple imprisonment as default punishment if the fine remains unpaid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

LABOUR COURT, MAHESANA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case