D.R.PARMAR,SARKARI SHRAM ADHIKARI AND CHILD LABOUR INSPECTOR vs HOTEL SHREEJI AND GUEST HOUSE Advocate - P M VYAS — 6/2026

Case under Child Labour (prohibition and Regulation) Act, 1986 Section 14,. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJMH140000232026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

6/2026

Filing Date

25-02-2026

Registration No

6/2026

Registration Date

25-02-2026

Court

LABOUR COURT, MAHESANA

Judge

1-JUDGE, LABOUR COURT

Decision Date

14th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Acts & Sections

CHILD LABOUR (PROHIBITION AND REGULATION) ACT, 1986 Section 14,

Petitioner(s)

D.R.PARMAR,SARKARI SHRAM ADHIKARI AND CHILD LABOUR INSPECTOR

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

HOTEL SHREEJI AND GUEST HOUSE Advocate - P M VYAS

NILESHBHAI DASHRATHBHAI CHAUDHARY

Adv. P M VYAS

Hearing History

Judge: 1-JUDGE, LABOUR COURT

14-03-2026

Disposed

12-03-2026

PLEA

07-03-2026

PLEA

Final Orders / Judgements

14-03-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Summary The Mehsana Labor Court convicted two defendants under Section 14(3)(B) of the Child and Adolescent Labor (Prohibition and Regulation) Act, 1986, for violating provisions protecting child labor. The defendants, who pleaded guilty and expressed remorse, claiming ignorance and no prior criminal record, were sentenced to pay fines of ₹10,000 each (₹20,000 total) with one month simple imprisonment as default punishment, following the court's application of sentencing principles established by Gujarat High Court precedent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Mehsana Labor Court convicted two defendants under Section 14(3)(B) of the Child and Adolescent Labor (Prohibition and Regulation) Act, 1986, for violating provisions protecting child labor. The defendants, who pleaded guilty and expressed remorse, claiming ignorance and no prior criminal record, were sentenced to pay fines of ₹10,000 each (₹20,000 total) with one month simple imprisonment as default punishment, following the court's application of sentencing principles established by Gujarat High Court precedent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

LABOUR COURT, MAHESANA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case