D.R.PARMAR,SARKARI SHRAM ADHIKARI AND CHILD LABOUR INSPECTOR vs HOTEL SAHYOG Advocate - P M VYAS — 4/2026

Case under Child Labour (Prohibition and Regulation) Act, 1986 Section 14. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJMH140000212026

Filing Number

4/2026

Filing Date

25-Feb-2026

Registration No

4/2026

Registration Date

25-Feb-2026

Court

LABOUR COURT, MAHESANA

Judge

1-Judge, Labour Court

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 13-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Child Labour (Prohibition and Regulation) Act, 1986 Section 14

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.D.R.PARMAR,SARKARI SHRAM ADHIKARI AND CHILD LABOUR INSPECTOR

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.HOTEL SAHYOG Advocate - P M VYAS

  2. 2.HASANBHAI ISMAILBHAI SUNSARA

    Adv. P M VYAS

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Summary The Labor Court in Mehsana found the defendants guilty of violating the Child and Adolescent Labor (Prohibition and Regulation) Act, 1986, after they voluntarily confessed to employing child labor without proper authorization. The court convicted them under Section 14(3)(B) of the Act and sentenced each defendant to pay a fine of ₹10,000 (totaling ₹20,000), with one month imprisonment as an alternative if the fine remains unpaid, considering their lack of criminal intent and first-time offense. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Judge, Labour Court

  4. 07-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 25-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 4/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Labor Court in Mehsana found the defendants guilty of violating the Child and Adolescent Labor (Prohibition and Regulation) Act, 1986, after they voluntarily confessed to employing child labor without proper authorization. The court convicted them under Section 14(3)(B) of the Act and sentenced each defendant to pay a fine of ₹10,000 (totaling ₹20,000), with one month imprisonment as an alternative if the fine remains unpaid, considering their lack of criminal intent and first-time offense. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case