D.R.PARMAR,SARKARI SHRAM ADHIKARI AND CHILD LABOUR INSPECTOR vs HOTEL SAHYOG Advocate - P M VYAS — 4/2026

Case under Child Labour (prohibition and Regulation) Act, 1986 Section 14,. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJMH140000212026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

4/2026

Filing Date

25-02-2026

Registration No

4/2026

Registration Date

25-02-2026

Court

LABOUR COURT, MAHESANA

Judge

1-JUDGE, LABOUR COURT

Decision Date

14th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Acts & Sections

CHILD LABOUR (PROHIBITION AND REGULATION) ACT, 1986 Section 14,

Petitioner(s)

D.R.PARMAR,SARKARI SHRAM ADHIKARI AND CHILD LABOUR INSPECTOR

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

HOTEL SAHYOG Advocate - P M VYAS

HASANBHAI ISMAILBHAI SUNSARA

Adv. P M VYAS

Hearing History

Judge: 1-JUDGE, LABOUR COURT

14-03-2026

Disposed

07-03-2026

PLEA

Final Orders / Judgements

14-03-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Summary The Labor Court in Mehsana found the defendants guilty of violating the Child and Adolescent Labor (Prohibition and Regulation) Act, 1986, after they voluntarily confessed to employing child labor without proper authorization. The court convicted them under Section 14(3)(B) of the Act and sentenced each defendant to pay a fine of ₹10,000 (totaling ₹20,000), with one month imprisonment as an alternative if the fine remains unpaid, considering their lack of criminal intent and first-time offense. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Labor Court in Mehsana found the defendants guilty of violating the Child and Adolescent Labor (Prohibition and Regulation) Act, 1986, after they voluntarily confessed to employing child labor without proper authorization. The court convicted them under Section 14(3)(B) of the Act and sentenced each defendant to pay a fine of ₹10,000 (totaling ₹20,000), with one month imprisonment as an alternative if the fine remains unpaid, considering their lack of criminal intent and first-time offense. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

LABOUR COURT, MAHESANA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case