JOGAJI AMRAJI THAKOR vs DEPUTY EXECUTIVE ENGINEER SHRI, PATAN CANAL SUB DIVISION Advocate - P A GANDHI — 7/2020
Case under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 10,. Disposed: Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED on 25th March 2026.
REFER T LC - Referance T
CNR: GJMH140000212020
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
7/2020
Filing Date
03-03-2020
Registration No
7/2020
Registration Date
03-03-2020
Court
LABOUR COURT, MAHESANA
Judge
1-JUDGE, LABOUR COURT
Decision Date
25th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
JOGAJI AMRAJI THAKOR
Adv. A R SHAHJADA
Respondent(s)
DEPUTY EXECUTIVE ENGINEER SHRI, PATAN CANAL SUB DIVISION Advocate - P A GANDHI
Hearing History
Judge: 1-JUDGE, LABOUR COURT
Disposed
For award
For Argument of Second party
For Evidence of first party
For Evidence of first party
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 25-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 10-03-2026 | For award | |
| 24-02-2026 | For Argument of Second party | |
| 10-02-2026 | For Evidence of first party | |
| 06-01-2026 | For Evidence of first party |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Mehsana Labor Court ruled that the irrigation department illegally terminated worker Jogaji Amaraji Thakor on March 1, 1998, in violation of Section 25-F of the Industrial Disputes Act, by terminating him without notice, notice wages, or proper procedure. Rather than ordering reinstatement after 22 years of delay, the court awarded him ₹50,000 as compensation along with 6% interest, considering the long passage of time and established legal principles that reinstatement is not automatic for daily-wage workers terminated illegally. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Mehsana Labor Court ruled that the irrigation department illegally terminated worker Jogaji Amaraji Thakor on March 1, 1998, in violation of Section 25-F of the Industrial Disputes Act, by terminating him without notice, notice wages, or proper procedure. Rather than ordering reinstatement after 22 years of delay, the court awarded him ₹50,000 as compensation along with 6% interest, considering the long passage of time and established legal principles that reinstatement is not automatic for daily-wage workers terminated illegally. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts