JOGAJI AMRAJI THAKOR vs DEPUTY EXECUTIVE ENGINEER SHRI, PATAN CANAL SUB DIVISION Advocate - P A GANDHI — 7/2020

Case under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 10. Disposed: Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED on 25th March 2026.

Case disposed

REFER T LC - Referance T

CNR: GJMH140000212020

Filing Number

7/2020

Filing Date

03-Mar-2020

Registration No

7/2020

Registration Date

03-Mar-2020

Court

LABOUR COURT, MAHESANA

Judge

1-Judge, Labour Court

Decision Date

25-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED

Last updated 05-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 10

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.JOGAJI AMRAJI THAKOR

    Adv. A R SHAHJADA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.DEPUTY EXECUTIVE ENGINEER SHRI, PATAN CANAL SUB DIVISION Advocate - P A GANDHI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 25-Mar-2026

    Judegement

    Summary The Mehsana Labor Court ruled that the irrigation department illegally terminated worker Jogaji Amaraji Thakor on March 1, 1998, in violation of Section 25-F of the Industrial Disputes Act, by terminating him without notice, notice wages, or proper procedure. Rather than ordering reinstatement after 22 years of delay, the court awarded him ₹50,000 as compensation along with 6% interest, considering the long passage of time and established legal principles that reinstatement is not automatic for daily-wage workers terminated illegally. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 25-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Judge, Labour Court

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    For award

    Judge, Labour Court

  5. 24-Feb-2026

    For Argument of Second party

    Judge, Labour Court

  6. 10-Feb-2026

    For Evidence of first party

    Judge, Labour Court

  7. 06-Jan-2026

    For Evidence of first party

    Judge, Labour Court

  8. 02-Dec-2025

    For Evidence of first party

    Judge, Labour Court

  9. 20-Nov-2025

    For Evidence of first party

    Judge, Labour Court

  10. 30-Oct-2025

    For Evidence of first party

    Judge, Labour Court

  11. 09-Oct-2025

    For Evidence of first party

    Judge, Labour Court

  12. 16-Sep-2025

    For Evidence of Second party

    Judge, Labour Court

  13. 05-Aug-2025

    For Evidence of Second party

    Judge, Labour Court

  14. 10-Jul-2025

    For Evidence of Second party

    Judge, Labour Court

  15. 05-Jun-2025

    For Evidence of Second party

    Judge, Labour Court

  16. 08-May-2025

    For Evidence of Second party

    Judge, Labour Court

  17. 17-Apr-2025

    For Evidence of Second party

    Judge, Labour Court

  18. 20-Mar-2025

    For Evidence of Second party

    Judge, Labour Court

  19. 06-Feb-2025

    For w.s. of First party

    Judge, Labour Court

  20. 12-Dec-2024

    For w.s. of First party

    Judge, Labour Court

  21. 10-Oct-2024

    For w.s. of First party

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  22. 01-Aug-2024

    For w.s. of First party

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  23. 13-Jun-2024

    For w.s. of First party

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  24. 25-Apr-2024

    For w.s. of First party

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  25. 14-Mar-2024

    For w.s. of First party

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  26. 25-Jan-2024

    For w.s. of First party

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  27. 21-Dec-2023

    For w.s. of First party

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  28. 02-Nov-2023

    For w.s. of First party

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  29. 14-Sep-2023

    For w.s. of First party

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  30. 20-Jul-2023

    For w.s. of First party

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  31. 01-Jun-2023

    For w.s. of First party

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  32. 20-Apr-2023

    For w.s. of First party

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  33. 16-Mar-2023

    For w.s. of First party

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  34. 02-Feb-2023

    For w.s. of First party

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  35. 22-Dec-2022

    For w.s. of First party

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  36. 17-Nov-2022

    For w.s. of First party

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  37. 06-Oct-2022

    For w.s. of First party

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  38. 01-Sep-2022

    For w.s. of First party

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  39. 14-Jul-2022

    For w.s. of First party

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  40. 09-Jun-2022

    For w.s. of First party

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  41. 05-May-2022

    For w.s. of First party

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  42. 24-Mar-2022

    For w.s. of First party

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  43. 10-Feb-2022

    For w.s. of First party

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  44. 30-Dec-2021

    For w.s. of First party

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  45. 25-Nov-2021

    For w.s. of First party

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  46. 07-Oct-2021

    For w.s. of First party

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  47. 02-Sep-2021

    For Statement of Claim

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  48. 08-Jul-2021

    For Statement of Claim

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  49. 29-Apr-2021

    For Statement of Claim

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  50. 25-Feb-2021

    For Statement of Claim

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  51. 24-Dec-2020

    For Notice Serve to both partys

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  52. 22-Oct-2020

    For Notice Serve to both partys

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  53. 27-Aug-2020

    For Notice Serve to both partys

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  54. 25-Jun-2020

    For Notice Serve to both partys

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  55. 30-Apr-2020

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  56. 03-Mar-2020

    Case filed

    Registration No. 7/2020

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Mehsana Labor Court ruled that the irrigation department illegally terminated worker Jogaji Amaraji Thakor on March 1, 1998, in violation of Section 25-F of the Industrial Disputes Act, by terminating him without notice, notice wages, or proper procedure. Rather than ordering reinstatement after 22 years of delay, the court awarded him ₹50,000 as compensation along with 6% interest, considering the long passage of time and established legal principles that reinstatement is not automatic for daily-wage workers terminated illegally. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case