A.S.SANGHVI, INSPECTOR OF INSPECTION OF BUILDING AND OTHER CONTRUCTION vs JASHBIR JUGALRAM YADAV, CONSTRUCTION OF WAREHOUSE Advocate - V S TRIVEDI — 4/2025
Case under The Building and Other Construction Workers (regulation of Employment and Conditions of Service) Act, 1996 Section 47,. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJMH140000082025
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
4/2025
Filing Date
26-04-2024
Registration No
4/2025
Registration Date
26-04-2024
Court
LABOUR COURT, MAHESANA
Judge
1-JUDGE, LABOUR COURT
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
A.S.SANGHVI, INSPECTOR OF INSPECTION OF BUILDING AND OTHER CONTRUCTION
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
JASHBIR JUGALRAM YADAV, CONSTRUCTION OF WAREHOUSE Advocate - V S TRIVEDI
Hearing History
Judge: 1-JUDGE, LABOUR COURT
Disposed
PLEA
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 13-03-2026 | PLEA | |
| 07-03-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED | |
| 21-02-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED | |
| 31-01-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary The court convicted the accused, Jashbir Jugalram Yadav, for violating Rule 261(B) of the Gujarat Building and Other Construction Rules 2003 under the Building and Other Construction Works Act 1996. The accused voluntarily confessed to the offense without any coercion. The court sentenced him to a fine of ₹2,000 with an alternative of one month simple imprisonment if the fine remains unpaid, considering his remorse and first-time offense while balancing the need for deterrence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary The court convicted the accused, Jashbir Jugalram Yadav, for violating Rule 261(B) of the Gujarat Building and Other Construction Rules 2003 under the Building and Other Construction Works Act 1996. The accused voluntarily confessed to the offense without any coercion. The court sentenced him to a fine of ₹2,000 with an alternative of one month simple imprisonment if the fine remains unpaid, considering his remorse and first-time offense while balancing the need for deterrence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts