KANUBHAI PUNJABHAI CHAUCHARI vs M.D.SHRI, DENA GUJARAT GRAMIN BANK Advocate - P F JHAVERI — 2/2015
Case under Gujarat Industrial Relation Act, 1946 Section 078. Status: For Evidence of Applicant. Next hearing: 10th April 2026.
CHANGE LC - Application for illegal change
CNR: GJMH140000022015
Next Hearing
10th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
2/2015
Filing Date
11-08-2015
Registration No
2/2015
Registration Date
11-08-2015
Court
LABOUR COURT, MAHESANA
Judge
1-JUDGE, LABOUR COURT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
KANUBHAI PUNJABHAI CHAUCHARI
Adv. R K CHAUDHARY
Respondent(s)
M.D.SHRI, DENA GUJARAT GRAMIN BANK Advocate - P F JHAVERI
REZUNAL MANAGER, DENA GUJARAT GRAMIN BANK
BRANCH MANAGER SHRI, DENA GUJARAT GRAMIN BANK
Hearing History
Judge: 1-JUDGE, LABOUR COURT
For Evidence of Applicant
For Evidence of Applicant
For Evidence of Applicant
For Evidence of Applicant
For Evidence of Applicant
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 16-03-2026 | For Evidence of Applicant | |
| 06-03-2026 | For Evidence of Applicant | |
| 23-02-2026 | For Evidence of Applicant | |
| 17-02-2026 | For Evidence of Applicant | |
| 06-02-2026 | For Evidence of Applicant |
Interim Orders
Summary: The Mehsana Labour Court dismissed the petition filed by Chari Kanubhai Punjabhai under sections 78-79 of the BIR Act against Dena Gujarat Gramin Bank for wrongful termination. The court found that the petitioner failed to substantiate his claims through documentary evidence or affidavit despite multiple opportunities, and did not appear in person to present his case. The petition was dismissed due to lack of evidence and non-appearance of the petitioner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The Mehsana Labour Court dismissed the petition filed by Chari Kanubhai Punjabhai under sections 78-79 of the BIR Act against Dena Gujarat Gramin Bank for wrongful termination. The court found that the petitioner failed to substantiate his claims through documentary evidence or affidavit despite multiple opportunities, and did not appear in person to present his case. The petition was dismissed due to lack of evidence and non-appearance of the petitioner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts