GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT vs PARMAR SANJAYBHAI MOHANBHAI — 2632/2024
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 457,380,114,. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 03rd April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJMH120033732024
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
2632/2024
Filing Date
19-12-2024
Registration No
2632/2024
Registration Date
19-12-2024
Court
TALUKA COURT, UNJHA
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Decision Date
03rd April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
11206033240167
Police Station
UNJHA POLICE STATION - MEHSANA DISTRICT
Year
2021
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
PARMAR SANJAYBHAI MOHANBHAI
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
JUDGEMENT
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 03-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 10-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT | |
| 27-02-2026 | JUDGEMENT | |
| 11-02-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION | |
| 27-01-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate Court in Unjha acquitted the accused Sanjaybhai under the Indian Penal Code sections 457, 380, and 114 (housebreaking, theft, and abetment) in a criminal case involving an alleged burglary where jewelry and cash worth ₹80,500 were reportedly stolen. The court found that while the complainant's witness testimony established a burglary occurred, the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the specific accused committed the theft, as no direct evidence linked the accused to the crime. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate Court in Unjha acquitted the accused Sanjaybhai under the Indian Penal Code sections 457, 380, and 114 (housebreaking, theft, and abetment) in a criminal case involving an alleged burglary where jewelry and cash worth ₹80,500 were reportedly stolen. The court found that while the complainant's witness testimony established a burglary occurred, the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the specific accused committed the theft, as no direct evidence linked the accused to the crime. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts