GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT vs MANISHABEN BALDEVJI THAKOR — 1438/2025

Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 152,352,351,54. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 13th April 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJMH120018832025

Filing Number

1438/2025

Filing Date

05-Dec-2025

Registration No

1438/2025

Registration Date

05-Dec-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, UNJHA

Judge

2-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

13-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

Last updated 06-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11206078250368

Police Station

UNAVA POLICE STATION- MAHESANA DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 152,352,351,54

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MANISHABEN BALDEVJI THAKOR

  2. 2.THAKOR VARSHABEN BALDEVJI

  3. 3.THAKOR MANJULABEN MAFAJI

  4. 4.RAVIKUMAR BALDEVJI THAKOR

  5. 5.HITESHKUMAR MAFAJI THAKOR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Apr-2026

    Judegement

    Case Summary The Unjha Judicial Magistrate acquitted all five accused under Indian Penal Code 2023 sections 115(2), 351(3), 352, 54, and G.P. Act 135, finding the prosecution failed to prove charges beyond reasonable doubt despite witness testimonies supporting the complainant's account of a village dispute resulting in injuries. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 30-Mar-2026

    Final Arguments

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 10-Mar-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 23-Feb-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  7. 27-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 05-Dec-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1438/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary The Unjha Judicial Magistrate acquitted all five accused under Indian Penal Code 2023 sections 115(2), 351(3), 352, 54, and G.P. Act 135, finding the prosecution failed to prove charges beyond reasonable doubt despite witness testimonies supporting the complainant's account of a village dispute resulting in injuries. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case