GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT vs THAKOR KAPILABEN ISHVARJI — 327/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJMH120004312026

Filing Number

327/2026

Filing Date

10-Mar-2026

Registration No

327/2026

Registration Date

10-Mar-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, UNJHA

Judge

2-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 06-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11206078260021

Police Station

UNAVA POLICE STATION- MAHESANA DISTRICT

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THAKOR KAPILABEN ISHVARJI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Summary The Unjha First Class Judicial Magistrate Court convicted the accused under Section 65(a)(a) of the Prohibition Act for possessing country-made liquor in quantities less than 20 liters. The accused pleaded guilty and expressed remorse, and considering his impoverished circumstances and the cited precedent, the court imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 200 fine and imprisonment until the rising of the court, with one day simple imprisonment in default of fine payment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 10-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 327/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Unjha First Class Judicial Magistrate Court convicted the accused under Section 65(a)(a) of the Prohibition Act for possessing country-made liquor in quantities less than 20 liters. The accused pleaded guilty and expressed remorse, and considering his impoverished circumstances and the cited precedent, the court imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 200 fine and imprisonment until the rising of the court, with one day simple imprisonment in default of fine payment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case