GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT vs MUKESHJI NENAJI THAKOR — 325/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJMH120004292026

Filing Number

325/2026

Filing Date

10-Mar-2026

Registration No

325/2026

Registration Date

10-Mar-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, UNJHA

Judge

2-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 06-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11206033260127

Police Station

UNJHA POLICE STATION - MEHSANA DISTRICT

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MUKESHJI NENAJI THAKOR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Order

    The Unjha Judicial Magistrate First Class convicted the accused of possessing country-made liquor in violation of the Prohibition Act, Section 65(a)(a), after the accused voluntarily confessed to the crime. The court sentenced the accused to a fine of ₹200 or one day simple imprisonment in default, considering mitigating factors including the accused's economic status and remorse, and ordered destruction of the seized contraband material. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 10-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 325/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Unjha Judicial Magistrate First Class convicted the accused of possessing country-made liquor in violation of the Prohibition Act, Section 65(a)(a), after the accused voluntarily confessed to the crime. The court sentenced the accused to a fine of ₹200 or one day simple imprisonment in default, considering mitigating factors including the accused's economic status and remorse, and ordered destruction of the seized contraband material. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case