GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT vs PARMAR HIRABHAI KALIDAS — 315/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJMH120004192026

Filing Number

315/2026

Filing Date

10-Mar-2026

Registration No

315/2026

Registration Date

10-Mar-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, UNJHA

Judge

2-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 06-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11206078260045

Police Station

UNAVA POLICE STATION- MAHESANA DISTRICT

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.PARMAR HIRABHAI KALIDAS

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The First Class Judicial Magistrate Court in Unjha convicted the accused under Gujarat Prohibition Act Section 66(1)(b) for consuming alcohol without permit in public. The accused pleaded guilty and requested mercy citing his poor financial condition and family responsibilities, which the court accepted as genuine. The court imposed a fine of Rs. 100 with imprisonment until the court rises, considering the accused's first offense and financial circumstances, citing the High Court's precedent for lenient sentencing in such cases. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 10-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 315/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The First Class Judicial Magistrate Court in Unjha convicted the accused under Gujarat Prohibition Act Section 66(1)(b) for consuming alcohol without permit in public. The accused pleaded guilty and requested mercy citing his poor financial condition and family responsibilities, which the court accepted as genuine. The court imposed a fine of Rs. 100 with imprisonment until the court rises, considering the accused's first offense and financial circumstances, citing the High Court's precedent for lenient sentencing in such cases. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case