GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT vs DEVIPUJAK SANJAYBHAI MANGABHAI — 314/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJMH120004182026

Filing Number

314/2026

Filing Date

10-Mar-2026

Registration No

314/2026

Registration Date

10-Mar-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, UNJHA

Judge

2-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 06-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11206078260052

Police Station

UNAVA POLICE STATION- MAHESANA DISTRICT

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.DEVIPUJAK SANJAYBHAI MANGABHAI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Order

    The court convicted the accused under Gujarat Prohibition Act Section 66(1)(b) for consuming alcohol in public without a permit. The accused voluntarily confessed to the crime and cited his poor economic status and family responsibilities; the court imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 100 fine and imprisonment till court rising (with an additional one day simple imprisonment if fine remains unpaid), citing principles of judicial mercy and the accused's first offense. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 10-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 314/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court convicted the accused under Gujarat Prohibition Act Section 66(1)(b) for consuming alcohol in public without a permit. The accused voluntarily confessed to the crime and cited his poor economic status and family responsibilities; the court imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 100 fine and imprisonment till court rising (with an additional one day simple imprisonment if fine remains unpaid), citing principles of judicial mercy and the accused's first offense. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case