GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT vs THAKOR MUKESHJI VAJAJI — 312/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJMH120004162026

Filing Number

312/2026

Filing Date

10-Mar-2026

Registration No

312/2026

Registration Date

10-Mar-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, UNJHA

Judge

2-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 06-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11206078260031

Police Station

UNAVA POLICE STATION- MAHESANA DISTRICT

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THAKOR MUKESHJI VAJAJI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Order

    Summary The Unjha Judicial Magistrate Court convicted the accused under Gujarat Prohibition Act Section 66(1)(B) for consuming alcohol in public without a permit. The accused voluntarily confessed to the crime and requested leniency, citing his poor economic status and family responsibilities. The court sentenced him to a fine of ₹100 with imprisonment until the rising of court, and one day simple imprisonment in default of fine payment, imposing a reduced sentence based on the accused's voluntary confession and financial circumstances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 10-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 312/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Unjha Judicial Magistrate Court convicted the accused under Gujarat Prohibition Act Section 66(1)(B) for consuming alcohol in public without a permit. The accused voluntarily confessed to the crime and requested leniency, citing his poor economic status and family responsibilities. The court sentenced him to a fine of ₹100 with imprisonment until the rising of court, and one day simple imprisonment in default of fine payment, imposing a reduced sentence based on the accused's voluntary confession and financial circumstances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case