GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT vs THAKOR LAKHIBEN CHHANAJI — 302/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJMH120004062026

Filing Number

302/2026

Filing Date

10-Mar-2026

Registration No

302/2026

Registration Date

10-Mar-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, UNJHA

Judge

2-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 06-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11206078260058

Police Station

UNAVA POLICE STATION- MAHESANA DISTRICT

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THAKOR LAKHIBEN CHHANAJI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Case Summary The Unjha Judicial Magistrate Court found the accused guilty of illegally possessing country-made liquor in violation of the Prohibition Act, Section 65(a)(a). The accused confessed to the crime and expressed remorse. Considering the accused's poor economic status and citing relevant case law, the court imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 200 fine and imprisonment until court closure; in case of non-payment, an additional one day simple imprisonment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 10-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 302/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary The Unjha Judicial Magistrate Court found the accused guilty of illegally possessing country-made liquor in violation of the Prohibition Act, Section 65(a)(a). The accused confessed to the crime and expressed remorse. Considering the accused's poor economic status and citing relevant case law, the court imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 200 fine and imprisonment until court closure; in case of non-payment, an additional one day simple imprisonment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case