GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT vs THAKOR LAKHIBEN MOGHAJI — 301/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJMH120004052026

Filing Number

301/2026

Filing Date

10-Mar-2026

Registration No

301/2026

Registration Date

10-Mar-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, UNJHA

Judge

2-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 06-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11206078260047

Police Station

UNAVA POLICE STATION- MAHESANA DISTRICT

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THAKOR LAKHIBEN MOGHAJI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Order

    Summary The Judicial Magistrate First Class, Unjha, convicted the accused under the Prohibition Act Section 65(a)(a) for illegally possessing country liquor (less than 20 liters). The accused pleaded guilty and expressed remorse. Considering the accused's poor economic status and citing precedent from Gujarat High Court, the court imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 200 fine and imprisonment until court rising, with an alternative of one day simple imprisonment if the fine is not paid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 10-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 301/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Judicial Magistrate First Class, Unjha, convicted the accused under the Prohibition Act Section 65(a)(a) for illegally possessing country liquor (less than 20 liters). The accused pleaded guilty and expressed remorse. Considering the accused's poor economic status and citing precedent from Gujarat High Court, the court imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 200 fine and imprisonment until court rising, with an alternative of one day simple imprisonment if the fine is not paid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case