GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT vs PARMAR RAJENDRABHAI KALABHAI — 289/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 223. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJMH120003932026

Filing Number

289/2026

Filing Date

10-Mar-2026

Registration No

289/2026

Registration Date

10-Mar-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, UNJHA

Judge

2-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 06-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11206078250539

Police Station

UNAVA POLICE STATION- MAHESANA DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 223

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.PARMAR RAJENDRABHAI KALABHAI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court convicted the accused under BNS 2023 Section 223 (a criminal offense) and sentenced him to a fine of Rs. 200 (rupees two hundred only) with 4 days imprisonment in default, considering the accused's plea of guilt, poor economic circumstances, and sole responsibility for his family's livelihood. The judgment emphasizes that a lighter sentence serves the interests of justice while accounting for the accused's socioeconomic hardship. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 10-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 289/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court convicted the accused under BNS 2023 Section 223 (a criminal offense) and sentenced him to a fine of Rs. 200 (rupees two hundred only) with 4 days imprisonment in default, considering the accused's plea of guilt, poor economic circumstances, and sole responsibility for his family's livelihood. The judgment emphasizes that a lighter sentence serves the interests of justice while accounting for the accused's socioeconomic hardship. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case