GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT vs SOLANKI DINESHBHAI ALIAS KALUBHAI PRAHLADBHAI — 281/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJMH120003852026

Filing Number

281/2026

Filing Date

10-Mar-2026

Registration No

281/2026

Registration Date

10-Mar-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, UNJHA

Judge

2-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 06-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11206033240708

Police Station

UNJHA POLICE STATION - MEHSANA DISTRICT

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SOLANKI DINESHBHAI ALIAS KALUBHAI PRAHLADBHAI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Order

    The Unjha First Class Judicial Magistrate Court convicted the accused under Gujarat Prohibition Act Section 66(1)(b) for consuming alcohol without a permit in public and sentenced him to a fine of Rs. 100 and simple imprisonment until the court rises, with an additional one day imprisonment if the fine is not paid. The court granted lenient punishment considering the accused's voluntary confession, poor economic circumstances, first offense, and family responsibilities. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 10-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 281/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Unjha First Class Judicial Magistrate Court convicted the accused under Gujarat Prohibition Act Section 66(1)(b) for consuming alcohol without a permit in public and sentenced him to a fine of Rs. 100 and simple imprisonment until the court rises, with an additional one day imprisonment if the fine is not paid. The court granted lenient punishment considering the accused's voluntary confession, poor economic circumstances, first offense, and family responsibilities. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case