GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT vs THAKOR AJITJI JOGAJI — 276/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJMH120003792026

Filing Number

276/2026

Filing Date

10-Mar-2026

Registration No

276/2026

Registration Date

10-Mar-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, UNJHA

Judge

2-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 06-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11206078250532

Police Station

UNAVA POLICE STATION- MAHESANA DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THAKOR AJITJI JOGAJI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Order

    Summary The Unjha Judicial Magistrate Court found the accused guilty of illegally possessing country-made liquor under the Prohibition Act Section 65(A)(A) and imposed a lenient sentence of ₹200 fine with imprisonment until court rising, or one day simple imprisonment if the fine is not paid. The court considered the accused's voluntary confession, remorse, and poor economic status as mitigating factors, citing a Gujarat High Court precedent on proportionate sentencing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 10-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 276/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Unjha Judicial Magistrate Court found the accused guilty of illegally possessing country-made liquor under the Prohibition Act Section 65(A)(A) and imposed a lenient sentence of ₹200 fine with imprisonment until court rising, or one day simple imprisonment if the fine is not paid. The court considered the accused's voluntary confession, remorse, and poor economic status as mitigating factors, citing a Gujarat High Court precedent on proportionate sentencing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case