GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT vs PATEL KALPESHKUMAR SITARAM — 274/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJMH120003772026

Filing Number

274/2026

Filing Date

10-Mar-2026

Registration No

274/2026

Registration Date

10-Mar-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, UNJHA

Judge

2-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 06-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11206033260055

Police Station

UNJHA POLICE STATION - MEHSANA DISTRICT

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.PATEL KALPESHKUMAR SITARAM

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The Judicial Magistrate First Class, Unjha convicted the accused under Gujarat Prohibition Act Section 66(1)(b) for public consumption of liquor without permit. The court imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 100 fine and imprisonment until court rises (considering the accused's poverty, family responsibilities, first-time offense, and voluntary confession), with one day additional imprisonment if the fine remains unpaid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 10-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 274/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Judicial Magistrate First Class, Unjha convicted the accused under Gujarat Prohibition Act Section 66(1)(b) for public consumption of liquor without permit. The court imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 100 fine and imprisonment until court rises (considering the accused's poverty, family responsibilities, first-time offense, and voluntary confession), with one day additional imprisonment if the fine remains unpaid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case