GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT vs JIGNESHBHAI MAHENDRABHAI SENMA — 266/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJMH120003692026

Filing Number

266/2026

Filing Date

10-Mar-2026

Registration No

266/2026

Registration Date

10-Mar-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, UNJHA

Judge

2-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 06-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11206033250803

Police Station

UNJHA POLICE STATION - MEHSANA DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.JIGNESHBHAI MAHENDRABHAI SENMA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The Judicial Magistrate First Class, Unjha, convicted the accused under Section 66(1)(b) of the Gujarat Prohibition Act for consuming alcohol in public without a permit. The accused voluntarily confessed to the crime and pleaded for leniency, citing poverty and family responsibilities. The court imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 100 fine (with one day simple imprisonment as default) instead of the maximum penalty, considering the accused's financial circumstances, first-time offense, and voluntary confession. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 10-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 266/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Judicial Magistrate First Class, Unjha, convicted the accused under Section 66(1)(b) of the Gujarat Prohibition Act for consuming alcohol in public without a permit. The accused voluntarily confessed to the crime and pleaded for leniency, citing poverty and family responsibilities. The court imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 100 fine (with one day simple imprisonment as default) instead of the maximum penalty, considering the accused's financial circumstances, first-time offense, and voluntary confession. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case