GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT vs PATEL ALPESH VITHTHALBHAI Advocate - R D KURESHI-G/910/2001 — 118/2024

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 279,337,338. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 07th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJMH120002442024

Filing Number

118/2024

Filing Date

15-Feb-2024

Registration No

118/2024

Registration Date

15-Feb-2024

Court

TALUKA COURT, UNJHA

Judge

2-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

07-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

Last updated 21-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 279,337,338
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 177,184

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.PATEL ALPESH VITHTHALBHAI Advocate - R D KURESHI-G/910/2001

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-Mar-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Summary of Court Decision The court acquitted the accused (Alpesh Bhai) of charges under IPC Sections 279, 337, and 338, and MV Act Sections 177 and 184. While the complainant alleged that the accused recklessly hit the complainant's motorcycle with his car on May 19, 2023, causing injuries, the court found that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. Key evidentiary gaps—including that no eyewitness directly observed the accused driving, the complainant could not identify the driver, and the complainant delayed filing the complaint by five months—created reasonable doubt regarding the accused's guilt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 06-Mar-2026

    Further Statement

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 24-Feb-2026

    Further Statement

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 10-Feb-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  7. 06-Jan-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  8. 09-Dec-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  9. 24-Nov-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  10. 13-Oct-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  11. 07-Oct-2025

    Further Statement

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  12. 09-Sep-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  13. 19-Aug-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  14. 15-Jul-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  15. 10-Jun-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  16. 19-May-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  17. 25-Mar-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  18. 28-Feb-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  19. 24-Jan-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  20. 24-Dec-2024

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  21. 26-Nov-2024

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  22. 05-Nov-2024

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  23. 04-Oct-2024

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  24. 30-Aug-2024

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  25. 02-Aug-2024

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  26. 05-Jul-2024

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  27. 07-Jun-2024

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  28. 24-May-2024

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  29. 03-May-2024

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  30. 12-Apr-2024

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  31. 22-Mar-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  32. 15-Feb-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 118/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Court Decision The court acquitted the accused (Alpesh Bhai) of charges under IPC Sections 279, 337, and 338, and MV Act Sections 177 and 184. While the complainant alleged that the accused recklessly hit the complainant's motorcycle with his car on May 19, 2023, causing injuries, the court found that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. Key evidentiary gaps—including that no eyewitness directly observed the accused driving, the complainant could not identify the driver, and the complainant delayed filing the complaint by five months—created reasonable doubt regarding the accused's guilt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case