MEMAN MOHMAD SAJID JANMOHMAD vs KURESHI AASHIF AIYUBBHAI Advocate - P J THAKOR — 624/2023

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138,. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY CONVICTION on 09th March 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJMH110007722023

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

624/2023

Filing Date

22-11-2023

Registration No

624/2023

Registration Date

22-11-2023

Court

TALUKA COURT, SATLASANA

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

09th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY CONVICTION

Acts & Sections

NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS ACT, 1881 Section 138,

Petitioner(s)

MEMAN MOHMAD SAJID JANMOHMAD

Adv. R S DARJI

Respondent(s)

KURESHI AASHIF AIYUBBHAI Advocate - P J THAKOR

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

09-03-2026

Disposed

16-02-2026

JUDGEMENT

12-01-2026

FINAL ARGUMENTS

11-12-2025

FINAL ARGUMENTS

11-11-2025

FINAL ARGUMENTS

Final Orders / Judgements

09-03-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Summary of Court's Decision The court convicted the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 for dishonoring a cheque of Rs. 90,000. The complainant successfully proved that the accused issued the cheque for discharging a legal debt, but failed to make payment within the statutory period despite receiving notice. The court sentenced the accused to one year simple imprisonment and imposed a fine of Rs. 90,000 (equivalent to twice the cheque amount), holding that the accused failed to rebut the legal presumption in favor of the cheque holder. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Court's Decision The court convicted the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 for dishonoring a cheque of Rs. 90,000. The complainant successfully proved that the accused issued the cheque for discharging a legal debt, but failed to make payment within the statutory period despite receiving notice. The court sentenced the accused to one year simple imprisonment and imposed a fine of Rs. 90,000 (equivalent to twice the cheque amount), holding that the accused failed to rebut the legal presumption in favor of the cheque holder. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, SATLASANA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case