MEMAN MOHMAD SAJID JANMOHMAD vs KURESHI AASHIF AIYUBBHAI Advocate - P J THAKOR — 624/2023
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138,. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY CONVICTION on 09th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJMH110007722023
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
624/2023
Filing Date
22-11-2023
Registration No
624/2023
Registration Date
22-11-2023
Court
TALUKA COURT, SATLASANA
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
09th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY CONVICTION
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
MEMAN MOHMAD SAJID JANMOHMAD
Adv. R S DARJI
Respondent(s)
KURESHI AASHIF AIYUBBHAI Advocate - P J THAKOR
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 16-02-2026 | JUDGEMENT | |
| 12-01-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS | |
| 11-12-2025 | FINAL ARGUMENTS | |
| 11-11-2025 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary of Court's Decision The court convicted the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 for dishonoring a cheque of Rs. 90,000. The complainant successfully proved that the accused issued the cheque for discharging a legal debt, but failed to make payment within the statutory period despite receiving notice. The court sentenced the accused to one year simple imprisonment and imposed a fine of Rs. 90,000 (equivalent to twice the cheque amount), holding that the accused failed to rebut the legal presumption in favor of the cheque holder. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary of Court's Decision The court convicted the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 for dishonoring a cheque of Rs. 90,000. The complainant successfully proved that the accused issued the cheque for discharging a legal debt, but failed to make payment within the statutory period despite receiving notice. The court sentenced the accused to one year simple imprisonment and imposed a fine of Rs. 90,000 (equivalent to twice the cheque amount), holding that the accused failed to rebut the legal presumption in favor of the cheque holder. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts