MEVA JIGNESHKUMAR VASHRAMBHAI vs JOSHI KULDIP SHANKARLAL Advocate - P J THAKOR — 270/2022
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138,. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY CONVICTION on 30th April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJMH110003342022
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
270/2022
Filing Date
24-06-2022
Registration No
270/2022
Registration Date
24-06-2022
Court
TALUKA COURT, SATLASANA
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
30th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY CONVICTION
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
MEVA JIGNESHKUMAR VASHRAMBHAI
Adv. R S DARJI
Respondent(s)
JOSHI KULDIP SHANKARLAL Advocate - P J THAKOR
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
JUDGEMENT
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 30-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 22-04-2026 | JUDGEMENT | |
| 25-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT | |
| 10-03-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS | |
| 02-03-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary Case: Criminal Case No. 270/2022, Satlasana Court Decision: The court found the accused (Kuldeep Shankar Lal) guilty under the Negotiable Instruments Act Section 138 for issuing a cheque (₹1,45,000) that was dishonored due to insufficient funds. The complainant had paid various loan amounts to the accused, who promised repayment but failed to honor the cheque given as security. Sentence: The accused is sentenced to one year simple imprisonment and ordered to pay ₹1,45,000 to the complainant within 30 days; failure results in additional two months imprisonment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Decision Summary Case: Criminal Case No. 270/2022, Satlasana Court Decision: The court found the accused (Kuldeep Shankar Lal) guilty under the Negotiable Instruments Act Section 138 for issuing a cheque (₹1,45,000) that was dishonored due to insufficient funds. The complainant had paid various loan amounts to the accused, who promised repayment but failed to honor the cheque given as security. Sentence: The accused is sentenced to one year simple imprisonment and ordered to pay ₹1,45,000 to the complainant within 30 days; failure results in additional two months imprisonment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts