Government of Gujarat vs THAKOR CHEHARAJI PRATAPJI KADAVAJI — 99/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 08th April 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJMH110001312026

Filing Number

99/2026

Filing Date

24-Mar-2026

Registration No

99/2026

Registration Date

24-Mar-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, SATLASANA

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

08-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 15-Jul-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11206062250528

Police Station

SATLASANA POLICE STATION- MEHSANA DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THAKOR CHEHARAJI PRATAPJI KADAVAJI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-Apr-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Case Summary: 99/2026 The court convicted Thakor Cheharaji Pratapji Kadavaji under Section 65(A)(A) of the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949, for unlawful possession of alcohol. The accused pleaded guilty to the charges after being afforded due legal process. Considering the accused's status as a poor person from a lower economic class and the gravity of the offense, the court sentenced him to a fine of ₹100 (one hundred rupees) in lieu of simple imprisonment for three days, with a provision for three days' simple imprisonment if the fine remains unpaid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 04-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 24-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 99/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 99/2026 The court convicted Thakor Cheharaji Pratapji Kadavaji under Section 65(A)(A) of the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949, for unlawful possession of alcohol. The accused pleaded guilty to the charges after being afforded due legal process. Considering the accused's status as a poor person from a lower economic class and the gravity of the offense, the court sentenced him to a fine of ₹100 (one hundred rupees) in lieu of simple imprisonment for three days, with a provision for three days' simple imprisonment if the fine remains unpaid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case