Government of Gujarat vs THAKOR RAVATAJI MADHAJI BHIKHAJI — 90/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 08th April 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJMH110001222026

Filing Number

90/2026

Filing Date

23-Mar-2026

Registration No

90/2026

Registration Date

23-Mar-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, SATLASANA

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

08-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 15-Jul-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11206062250495

Police Station

SATLASANA POLICE STATION- MEHSANA DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THAKOR RAVATAJI MADHAJI BHIKHAJI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-Apr-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Case 90/2026 Summary The court convicted Thakor Ravataji Madhaji Bhikhaji under Section 65(A)(A) of the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949, for the offense of illicit distillation of liquor. The accused, a poor person from a lower economic class, pleaded guilty and sought leniency; the court sentenced him to imprisonment until the rising of the court plus a fine of ₹100, with three days' simple imprisonment as an alternative if the fine remains unpaid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 04-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 23-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 90/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case 90/2026 Summary The court convicted Thakor Ravataji Madhaji Bhikhaji under Section 65(A)(A) of the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949, for the offense of illicit distillation of liquor. The accused, a poor person from a lower economic class, pleaded guilty and sought leniency; the court sentenced him to imprisonment until the rising of the court plus a fine of ₹100, with three days' simple imprisonment as an alternative if the fine remains unpaid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case