THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs LALAJI NARBHAJI VIRAMJI THAKOR Advocate - G B THAKOR — 124/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)b,85(1). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposedSub Stage

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJMH090001722026

Filing Number

124/2026

Filing Date

10-Mar-2026

Registration No

124/2026

Registration Date

10-Mar-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, VADNAGAR

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 06-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11206073250753

Police Station

VADNAGAR POLICE STATION- MEHSANA DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)b,85(1)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.LALAJI NARBHAJI VIRAMJI THAKOR Advocate - G B THAKOR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Order

    The Vadnagar First Class Judicial Magistrate Court convicted defendant Lalaji Narbhaji Virmaji Thakor under the Gujarat Prohibition Act sections 66(1)(b) and 85(1), sentencing him to pay a total fine of Rs. 200 after he voluntarily pleaded guilty. The court considered his remorse, ignorance of law, first-time offense, and poor socioeconomic status as mitigating factors, imposing a lenient sentence with seven days simple imprisonment as an alternative if the fine remains unpaid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 10-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 124/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Vadnagar First Class Judicial Magistrate Court convicted defendant Lalaji Narbhaji Virmaji Thakor under the Gujarat Prohibition Act sections 66(1)(b) and 85(1), sentencing him to pay a total fine of Rs. 200 after he voluntarily pleaded guilty. The court considered his remorse, ignorance of law, first-time offense, and poor socioeconomic status as mitigating factors, imposing a lenient sentence with seven days simple imprisonment as an alternative if the fine remains unpaid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case