THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs PATEL UPENDRABHAI SOMABHAI NAROTTAMBHAI Advocate - P P THAKOR — 123/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)b,85(1). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposedSub Stage

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJMH090001702026

Filing Number

123/2026

Filing Date

10-Mar-2026

Registration No

123/2026

Registration Date

10-Mar-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, VADNAGAR

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 06-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11206073250749

Police Station

VADNAGAR POLICE STATION- MEHSANA DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)b,85(1)

Petitioner(s)

1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

1.PATEL UPENDRABHAI SOMABHAI NAROTTAMBHAI Advocate - P P THAKOR

Case History

Case disposedDisposed
14-Mar-2026

Order

The court found the accused, Patel Upendrai Somabhai Narotambhai, guilty under sections 66(1)(b) and 85(1) of the Gujarat Prohibition Act and sentenced him to pay a fine of ₹200 (₹100 under each section), with seven days simple imprisonment as alternative punishment if the fine is not paid. The judgment considered the accused's voluntary confession, first-time offense, remorse, ignorance of law, and socio-economic circumstances as mitigating factors. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
14-Mar-2026

Disposed

Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
10-Mar-2026

First hearing

Initial hearing scheduled
10-Mar-2026

Case filed

Registration No. 123/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court found the accused, Patel Upendrai Somabhai Narotambhai, guilty under sections 66(1)(b) and 85(1) of the Gujarat Prohibition Act and sentenced him to pay a fine of ₹200 (₹100 under each section), with seven days simple imprisonment as alternative punishment if the fine is not paid. The judgment considered the accused's voluntary confession, first-time offense, remorse, ignorance of law, and socio-economic circumstances as mitigating factors. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.