THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs SENMA JIGARBHAI HEMABHAI MAGANBHAI Advocate - J S THAKOR — 120/2026

Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 185,. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJMH090001672026

Case disposedSub Stage

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

120/2026

Filing Date

10-03-2026

Registration No

120/2026

Registration Date

10-03-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, VADNAGAR

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

FIR Details

FIR Number

11206073260003

Police Station

VADNAGAR POLICE STATION- MEHSANA DISTRICT

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

MOTOR VEHICLES ACT, 1988 Section 185,
GUJARAT (BOMBAY) PROHIBITION ACT, 1949 Section 66(1)b,

Petitioner(s)

THE STATE OF GUJARAT

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

SENMA JIGARBHAI HEMABHAI MAGANBHAI Advocate - J S THAKOR

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

14-03-2026

Disposed

10-03-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

Final Orders / Judgements

14-03-2026
ORDER

The court found the accused, Senma Jigarabhai Hemabhai Maganbhai, guilty of offenses under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (Section 185) and the Gujarat Prohibition Act (Section 66(1)(b)), and sentenced him to pay a fine of Rs. 1,100 (Rs. 1,000 under MV Act and Rs. 100 under Prohibition Act), with seven days simple imprisonment as default punishment. The court considered the accused's voluntary confession, first-time offender status, and socioeconomic circumstances as mitigating factors in imposing the lenient sentence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The court found the accused, Senma Jigarabhai Hemabhai Maganbhai, guilty of offenses under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (Section 185) and the Gujarat Prohibition Act (Section 66(1)(b)), and sentenced him to pay a fine of Rs. 1,100 (Rs. 1,000 under MV Act and Rs. 100 under Prohibition Act), with seven days simple imprisonment as default punishment. The court considered the accused's voluntary confession, first-time offender status, and socioeconomic circumstances as mitigating factors in imposing the lenient sentence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, VADNAGAR All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case