THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs SENMA JIGARBHAI HEMABHAI MAGANBHAI Advocate - J S THAKOR — 120/2026

Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 185. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposedSub Stage

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJMH090001672026

Filing Number

120/2026

Filing Date

10-Mar-2026

Registration No

120/2026

Registration Date

10-Mar-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, VADNAGAR

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 06-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11206073260003

Police Station

VADNAGAR POLICE STATION- MEHSANA DISTRICT

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 185
Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)b

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SENMA JIGARBHAI HEMABHAI MAGANBHAI Advocate - J S THAKOR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court found the accused, Senma Jigarabhai Hemabhai Maganbhai, guilty of offenses under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (Section 185) and the Gujarat Prohibition Act (Section 66(1)(b)), and sentenced him to pay a fine of Rs. 1,100 (Rs. 1,000 under MV Act and Rs. 100 under Prohibition Act), with seven days simple imprisonment as default punishment. The court considered the accused's voluntary confession, first-time offender status, and socioeconomic circumstances as mitigating factors in imposing the lenient sentence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 10-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 120/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court found the accused, Senma Jigarabhai Hemabhai Maganbhai, guilty of offenses under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (Section 185) and the Gujarat Prohibition Act (Section 66(1)(b)), and sentenced him to pay a fine of Rs. 1,100 (Rs. 1,000 under MV Act and Rs. 100 under Prohibition Act), with seven days simple imprisonment as default punishment. The court considered the accused's voluntary confession, first-time offender status, and socioeconomic circumstances as mitigating factors in imposing the lenient sentence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case