THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs THAKOR CHETANJI JYANTIJI KARSHANJI Advocate - J S THAKOR — 104/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)b,85(1). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposedSub Stage

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJMH090001502026

Filing Number

104/2026

Filing Date

06-Mar-2026

Registration No

104/2026

Registration Date

06-Mar-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, VADNAGAR

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 21-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)b,85(1)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THAKOR CHETANJI JYANTIJI KARSHANJI Advocate - J S THAKOR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Summary The Vadnagar First Class Judicial Magistrate Court convicted defendant Thakor Chetnaji Jayantiji Karshnji under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, Sections 66(1)(b) and 85(1), after he voluntarily pleaded guilty to the charges. The court imposed a total fine of ₹200 (₹100 under each section), with a default jail sentence of 7 days if the fine remains unpaid, considering it as the defendant's first offense, his family circumstances as the sole breadwinner, and his remorse. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 06-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 06-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 104/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Vadnagar First Class Judicial Magistrate Court convicted defendant Thakor Chetnaji Jayantiji Karshnji under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, Sections 66(1)(b) and 85(1), after he voluntarily pleaded guilty to the charges. The court imposed a total fine of ₹200 (₹100 under each section), with a default jail sentence of 7 days if the fine remains unpaid, considering it as the defendant's first offense, his family circumstances as the sole breadwinner, and his remorse. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case