CHAUDHARY KANKUBEN RAMJIBHAI vs CHAUDHARY DAHYABHAI LALABHAI Advocate - K S RABARI — 4/2022
Case under Specific Relief Act, 1963 Section 38. Status: DEFENDANT EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 08th June 2026.
RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJMH090000602022
Next Hearing
08th June 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
4/2022
Filing Date
07-02-2022
Registration No
4/2022
Registration Date
07-02-2022
Court
TALUKA COURT, VADNAGAR
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
CHAUDHARY KANKUBEN RAMJIBHAI
Adv. V B THAKOR
CHAUDHARY SURESHBHAI RAMJIBHAI
Adv. K K RAVAL
CHAUDHARY MADHABHAI LAVJIBHAI(Legal Heir)
Adv. K K RAVAL3.
CHAUDHARY DALIBEN MADHABHAI
Adv. K K RAVAL3.
CHAUDHARY DOVINDBHAI MADHABHAI
Adv. K K RAVAL3.
CHAUDHARY BHARATBHAI MADHABHAI
Adv. K K RAVAL3.
CHAUDHARY DINESHBHAI MADHABHAI
Adv. K K RAVAL3.
CHAUDHARI JANAKBHAI MADHABHAI
Adv. K K RAVAL
Respondent(s)
CHAUDHARY DAHYABHAI LALABHAI Advocate - K S RABARI
CHAUDHARY VIRSHANGBHAI LALABHAI
Adv. K S RABARI
CHAUDHARY GANESHABHAI LALABHAI
Adv. K S RABARI
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
DEFENDANT EVIDENCE
DEFENDANT EVIDENCE
DEFENDANT EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 21-04-2026 | DEFENDANT EVIDENCE | |
| 06-04-2026 | DEFENDANT EVIDENCE | |
| 10-03-2026 | DEFENDANT EVIDENCE | |
| 23-02-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE | |
| 19-01-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
Case Summary Temporary Injunction Application Rejected The Principal Civil Judge, Vadnagar rejected the plaintiffs' application for temporary injunction seeking to restrain defendants from obstructing their right of way. The court found that plaintiffs failed to establish a prima facie case, as an alternative route exists through family properties (Survey Nos. 443 and 445) accessible via a coal-tar road, and the plaintiffs did not adequately prove their claimed easement right by prescription. No costs were imposed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary Temporary Injunction Application Rejected The Principal Civil Judge, Vadnagar rejected the plaintiffs' application for temporary injunction seeking to restrain defendants from obstructing their right of way. The court found that plaintiffs failed to establish a prima facie case, as an alternative route exists through family properties (Survey Nos. 443 and 445) accessible via a coal-tar road, and the plaintiffs did not adequately prove their claimed easement right by prescription. No costs were imposed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts