PATEL DIVABENU W/O JAYANTIBHAI RAMDAS vs LATE -THAKOR JESANGJI KUVARJI Advocate - V B THAKOR — 32/2014

Case under Specific Relief Act, 1963 Section 005,031,038. Status: DEFENDANT EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 08th June 2026.

RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT

CNR: GJMH090000382014

DEFENDANT EVIDENCE

Next Hearing

08th June 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

32/2014

Filing Date

11-11-2014

Registration No

32/2014

Registration Date

11-11-2014

Court

TALUKA COURT, VADNAGAR

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

Acts & Sections

SPECIFIC RELIEF ACT, 1963 Section 005,031,038

Petitioner(s)

PATEL DIVABENU W/O JAYANTIBHAI RAMDAS

Adv. I A MANSURI

PATEL BHAVESHKUMAR JAYANTIBHAI

Adv. I A MANSURI

PATEL GIRISHKUMAR JAYANTIBHAI

Adv. I A MANSURI

PATEL SULOCHANABEN JAYANTIBHAI

Adv. I A MANSURI

PATEL SONALBEN JAYANTIBHAI

Adv. I A MANSURI

Respondent(s)

LATE -THAKOR JESANGJI KUVARJI Advocate - V B THAKOR

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

27-04-2026

DEFENDANT EVIDENCE

23-03-2026

DEFENDANT EVIDENCE

10-03-2026

DEFENDANT EVIDENCE

23-02-2026

DEFENDANT EVIDENCE

16-02-2026

DEFENDANT EVIDENCE

Interim Orders

28-11-2016
ORDER
03-04-2024
ORDER

Summary: The suit (RCS No. 32.2014) has been dismissed for want of amended plaint. The Principal Civil Judge at Vadnagar found that despite multiple opportunities and court orders, the plaintiff's advocate failed to file the amended plaint within the stipulated time and did not appear in subsequent hearings. The defendants' counter-claim will proceed separately against the plaintiff as per law, with no order on costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The suit (RCS No. 32.2014) has been dismissed for want of amended plaint. The Principal Civil Judge at Vadnagar found that despite multiple opportunities and court orders, the plaintiff's advocate failed to file the amended plaint within the stipulated time and did not appear in subsequent hearings. The defendants' counter-claim will proceed separately against the plaintiff as per law, with no order on costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, VADNAGAR All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case