THAKOR PUNAJI KAMAJI vs THAKOR MELAJI HALAJI — 54/2021

Case under Specific Relief Act, 1963 Section 34. Status: Defendant Evidence. Next hearing: 13th May 2026.

Defendant Evidence Next hearing 13-May-2026 this date has passed

RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT

CNR: GJMH080013892021

Filing Number

54/2021

Filing Date

19-Aug-2021

Registration No

54/2021

Registration Date

19-Aug-2021

Court

TALUKA COURT, BECHARAJI

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Last updated 05-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act, 1963 Section 34

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THAKOR PUNAJI KAMAJI

    Adv. H.N.SHRIMALI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THAKOR MELAJI HALAJI

  2. 2.THAKOR GELAJI HALAJI

    Adv. P A RATHOD

  3. 3.THAKOR BALIBEN HALAJI

  4. 4.THAKOR SHANTIBEN HALAJI

  5. 5.THAKOR KANTABEN HALAJI

Case History

  1. 13-May-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 04-May-2026

    Defendant Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  3. 17-Apr-2026

    Defendant Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 03-Apr-2026

    Defendant Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 10-Mar-2026

    Defendant Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 11-Feb-2026

    Defendant Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  7. 08-Jan-2026

    Defendant Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  8. 20-Dec-2025

    Defendant Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  9. 25-Nov-2025

    Defendant Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  10. 19-Nov-2025

    Defendant Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  11. 14-Oct-2025

    Defendant Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  12. 16-Sep-2025

    Defendant Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  13. 28-Aug-2025

    Defendant Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  14. 29-Jul-2025

    Defendant Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  15. 14-Jul-2025

    Defendant Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  16. 17-Jun-2025

    Defendant Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  17. 02-Apr-2025

    Defendant Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  18. 12-Mar-2025

    Defendant Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  19. 07-Jan-2025

    Defendant Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  20. 02-Dec-2024

    Defendant Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  21. 04-Nov-2024

    Defendant Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  22. 28-Aug-2024

    Defendant Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  23. 23-Jul-2024

    Defendant Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  24. 18-Jun-2024

    Defendant Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  25. 27-Mar-2024

    Defendant Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  26. 29-Jan-2024

    Defendant Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  27. 27-Dec-2023

    Defendant Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  28. 28-Nov-2023

    Defendant Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  29. 11-Oct-2023

    Defendant Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  30. 13-Sep-2023

    Defendant Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  31. 14-Aug-2023

    Defendant Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  32. 17-Jul-2023

    Defendant Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  33. 14-Jun-2023

    Defendant Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  34. 25-Apr-2023

    Defendant Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  35. 05-Apr-2023

    Defendant Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  36. 21-Mar-2023

    Defendant Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  37. 08-Feb-2023

    Defendant Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  38. 03-Jan-2023

    Defendant Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  39. 06-Dec-2022

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  40. 09-Nov-2022

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  41. 04-Oct-2022

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  42. 06-Sep-2022

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  43. 25-Jul-2022

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  44. 23-Jun-2022

    Issues

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  45. 10-May-2022

    Issues

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  46. 11-Apr-2022

    OrderView PDF

    Summary The plaintiff's appeal against the defendants' objections to a land sale claim was dismissed. The court held that the plaintiff failed to establish a valid prima facie case regarding ownership of the disputed agricultural land, as crucial documents like a registered sale deed and evidence of possession since the alleged 1985 sale were absent. The court also rejected the plaintiff's claim due to lack of proper documentary proof and found the defendants' defense regarding their ancestors' possession to be credible. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  47. 11-Apr-2022

    Issues

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  48. 01-Apr-2022

    Hearing On Injunction Application

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  49. 16-Mar-2022

    Hearing On Injunction Application

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  50. 07-Mar-2022

    Hearing On Injunction Application

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  51. 05-Feb-2022

    Hearing On Injunction Application

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  52. 19-Jan-2022

    Hearing On Injunction Application

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  53. 16-Dec-2021

    Hearing On Injunction Application

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  54. 29-Nov-2021

    Hearing On Injunction Application

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  55. 25-Oct-2021

    Summons - Notice

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  56. 14-Oct-2021

    Summons - Notice

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  57. 18-Sep-2021

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  58. 19-Aug-2021

    Case filed

    Registration No. 54/2021

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The plaintiff's appeal against the defendants' objections to a land sale claim was dismissed. The court held that the plaintiff failed to establish a valid prima facie case regarding ownership of the disputed agricultural land, as crucial documents like a registered sale deed and evidence of possession since the alleged 1985 sale were absent. The court also rejected the plaintiff's claim due to lack of proper documentary proof and found the defendants' defense regarding their ancestors' possession to be credible. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case