THAKOR PUNAJI KAMAJI vs THAKOR MELAJI HALAJI — 54/2021
Case under Specific Relief Act, 1963 Section 34,. Status: DEFENDANT EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 13th May 2026.
RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJMH080013892021
Next Hearing
13th May 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
54/2021
Filing Date
19-08-2021
Registration No
54/2021
Registration Date
19-08-2021
Court
TALUKA COURT, BECHARAJI
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
THAKOR PUNAJI KAMAJI
Adv. H.N.SHRIMALI
Respondent(s)
THAKOR MELAJI HALAJI
THAKOR GELAJI HALAJI
Adv. P A RATHOD
THAKOR BALIBEN HALAJI
THAKOR SHANTIBEN HALAJI
THAKOR KANTABEN HALAJI
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
DEFENDANT EVIDENCE
DEFENDANT EVIDENCE
DEFENDANT EVIDENCE
DEFENDANT EVIDENCE
DEFENDANT EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 04-05-2026 | DEFENDANT EVIDENCE | |
| 17-04-2026 | DEFENDANT EVIDENCE | |
| 03-04-2026 | DEFENDANT EVIDENCE | |
| 10-03-2026 | DEFENDANT EVIDENCE | |
| 11-02-2026 | DEFENDANT EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
Summary The plaintiff's appeal against the defendants' objections to a land sale claim was dismissed. The court held that the plaintiff failed to establish a valid prima facie case regarding ownership of the disputed agricultural land, as crucial documents like a registered sale deed and evidence of possession since the alleged 1985 sale were absent. The court also rejected the plaintiff's claim due to lack of proper documentary proof and found the defendants' defense regarding their ancestors' possession to be credible. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The plaintiff's appeal against the defendants' objections to a land sale claim was dismissed. The court held that the plaintiff failed to establish a valid prima facie case regarding ownership of the disputed agricultural land, as crucial documents like a registered sale deed and evidence of possession since the alleged 1985 sale were absent. The court also rejected the plaintiff's claim due to lack of proper documentary proof and found the defendants' defense regarding their ancestors' possession to be credible. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts