GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT vs THAKOR KALPESHJI VIRAJI BHIKHAJI — 631/2025
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJMH080008062025
Filing Number
631/2025
Filing Date
17-Sep-2025
Registration No
631/2025
Registration Date
17-Sep-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, BECHARAJI
Judge
1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY
Last updated 13-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11206008250156
Police Station
BECHRAJI POLICE STATION- MEHSANA DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.THAKOR KALPESHJI VIRAJI BHIKHAJI
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
Summary The court convicted the accused under Gujarat Prohibition Act, Section 65(A)(A) for illicit liquor possession. Considering the accused's voluntary plea, poor economic circumstances, and family responsibilities, the court imposed a reduced sentence of Rs. 300 fine with 7 days simple imprisonment in default, exercising judicial discretion to serve the broader interests of justice rather than imposing the maximum prescribed penalty. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
07-Mar-2026
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
26-Feb-2026
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
20-Jan-2026
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
10-Dec-2025
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
30-Oct-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
17-Sep-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 631/2025
Summary The court convicted the accused under Gujarat Prohibition Act, Section 65(A)(A) for illicit liquor possession. Considering the accused's voluntary plea, poor economic circumstances, and family responsibilities, the court imposed a reduced sentence of Rs. 300 fine with 7 days simple imprisonment in default, exercising judicial discretion to serve the broader interests of justice rather than imposing the maximum prescribed penalty. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts