GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT vs BABUJI KUMPAJI MOHANJI THAKOR — 623/2025
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJMH080007982025
Filing Number
623/2025
Filing Date
16-Sep-2025
Registration No
623/2025
Registration Date
16-Sep-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, BECHARAJI
Judge
1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY
Last updated 05-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11206077250160
Police Station
MODHERA POLICE STATION- MAHESANA DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.BABUJI KUMPAJI MOHANJI THAKOR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
Case Summary Case: Criminal Case No. 623/2025 under Gujarat Prohibition Act, Section 65(A)(A) Court's Decision: The court convicted the accused of violating the Gujarat Prohibition Act and sentenced him to a fine of Rs. 300 or, in default, seven days simple imprisonment. Considering the accused's economic circumstances, family responsibilities, and voluntary confession, the court imposed a lesser sentence than the maximum prescribed, finding it would serve the interests of justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
10-Mar-2026
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
27-Jan-2026
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
13-Dec-2025
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
08-Dec-2025
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
27-Oct-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
16-Sep-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 623/2025
Case Summary Case: Criminal Case No. 623/2025 under Gujarat Prohibition Act, Section 65(A)(A) Court's Decision: The court convicted the accused of violating the Gujarat Prohibition Act and sentenced him to a fine of Rs. 300 or, in default, seven days simple imprisonment. Considering the accused's economic circumstances, family responsibilities, and voluntary confession, the court imposed a lesser sentence than the maximum prescribed, finding it would serve the interests of justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts