GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT vs BABUJI KUMPAJI MOHANJI THAKOR — 623/2025

Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJMH080007982025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

623/2025

Filing Date

16-09-2025

Registration No

623/2025

Registration Date

16-09-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, BECHARAJI

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

FIR Details

FIR Number

11206077250160

Police Station

MODHERA POLICE STATION- MAHESANA DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

GUJARAT (BOMBAY) PROHIBITION ACT, 1949 Section 65AA

Petitioner(s)

GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

BABUJI KUMPAJI MOHANJI THAKOR

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

14-03-2026

Disposed

10-03-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

27-01-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

13-12-2025

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

08-12-2025

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

Final Orders / Judgements

14-03-2026
ORDER

Case Summary Case: Criminal Case No. 623/2025 under Gujarat Prohibition Act, Section 65(A)(A) Court's Decision: The court convicted the accused of violating the Gujarat Prohibition Act and sentenced him to a fine of Rs. 300 or, in default, seven days simple imprisonment. Considering the accused's economic circumstances, family responsibilities, and voluntary confession, the court imposed a lesser sentence than the maximum prescribed, finding it would serve the interests of justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary Case: Criminal Case No. 623/2025 under Gujarat Prohibition Act, Section 65(A)(A) Court's Decision: The court convicted the accused of violating the Gujarat Prohibition Act and sentenced him to a fine of Rs. 300 or, in default, seven days simple imprisonment. Considering the accused's economic circumstances, family responsibilities, and voluntary confession, the court imposed a lesser sentence than the maximum prescribed, finding it would serve the interests of justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, BECHARAJI All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case