Government of Gujarat vs PATEL ANKURBHAI DINESHBHAI BHIKHABHAI Advocate - D S UPADHYAY — 1595/2023

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 279,337,338,304A. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 01st April 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJMH070026172023

Filing Number

1595/2023

Filing Date

08-Dec-2023

Registration No

1595/2023

Registration Date

08-Dec-2023

Court

TALUKA COURT, VIJAPUR

Judge

1-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

Decision Date

01-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

Last updated 05-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11206074230538

Police Station

VIJAPUR POLICE STATION- MEHSANA DISTRICT

Year

2023

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 279,337,338,304A
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 177,184

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.PATEL ANKURBHAI DINESHBHAI BHIKHABHAI Advocate - D S UPADHYAY

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 01-Apr-2026

    Judegement

    Court Decision Summary The Vijaypur Chief Judicial Magistrate's court acquitted the accused (Patel Ankurbhai Dineshbhai) of charges under Indian Penal Code sections 279, 337, 338, 304(A), and IPC section 177/178, in a motor vehicle accident case resulting in one death and injuries to others. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused drove the vehicle recklessly or negligently, as mere carelessness or error of judgment is insufficient—the elements of rash/negligent driving must be established conclusively, which the evidence did not demonstrate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 01-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  5. 28-Jan-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  6. 22-Dec-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  7. 29-Oct-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  8. 06-Oct-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  9. 20-Aug-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  10. 15-Jul-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  11. 06-May-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  12. 16-Apr-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  13. 25-Feb-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  14. 07-Jan-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  15. 25-Nov-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  16. 15-Oct-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  17. 04-Sep-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  18. 08-Jul-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  19. 15-May-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  20. 08-Apr-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  21. 19-Mar-2024

    Framing Of Charge

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  22. 06-Feb-2024

    Process To Accused

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  23. 09-Jan-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  24. 08-Dec-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1595/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The Vijaypur Chief Judicial Magistrate's court acquitted the accused (Patel Ankurbhai Dineshbhai) of charges under Indian Penal Code sections 279, 337, 338, 304(A), and IPC section 177/178, in a motor vehicle accident case resulting in one death and injuries to others. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused drove the vehicle recklessly or negligently, as mere carelessness or error of judgment is insufficient—the elements of rash/negligent driving must be established conclusively, which the evidence did not demonstrate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case