Government of Gujarat vs RAVAL DHRUVKUMAR MUKESHBHAI — 1583/2025
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prevention of Gambling Act, 1887 Section 12. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJMH070022062025
Filing Number
1583/2025
Filing Date
30-Oct-2025
Registration No
1583/2025
Registration Date
30-Oct-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, VIJAPUR
Judge
1-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY
Last updated 16-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11206074250280
Police Station
VIJAPUR POLICE STATION- MEHSANA DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.RAVAL DHRUVKUMAR MUKESHBHAI
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
Summary In this criminal case under the Gambling Act, the Vijiapur Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate convicted the accused, Dhruvkumar Mukeshbhai Shambhubhai Ravol, of gambling-related offenses. The court sentenced him to simple imprisonment for 15 days and imposed a fine of Rs. 200 (with 15 days additional imprisonment if the fine remains unpaid), considering his impoverished background as a mitigating factor while applying principles of proportionate sentencing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
09-Mar-2026
Process To Accused
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
31-Jan-2026
Process To Accused
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
13-Dec-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
30-Oct-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 1583/2025
Summary In this criminal case under the Gambling Act, the Vijiapur Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate convicted the accused, Dhruvkumar Mukeshbhai Shambhubhai Ravol, of gambling-related offenses. The court sentenced him to simple imprisonment for 15 days and imposed a fine of Rs. 200 (with 15 days additional imprisonment if the fine remains unpaid), considering his impoverished background as a mitigating factor while applying principles of proportionate sentencing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts