Government of Gujarat vs RATHOD SAJJANSINH @ YASHPALSINH @ KAKA JALAMSINH AGARSINH Advocate - K B RATHOD — 1212/2023
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 279,337,338,427,323,114. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 01st April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJMH070019442023
Filing Number
1212/2023
Filing Date
24-Aug-2023
Registration No
1212/2023
Registration Date
24-Aug-2023
Court
TALUKA COURT, VIJAPUR
Judge
1-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
Decision Date
01-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
Last updated 05-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11206074230268
Police Station
VIJAPUR POLICE STATION- MEHSANA DISTRICT
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.RATHOD SAJJANSINH @ YASHPALSINH @ KAKA JALAMSINH AGARSINH Advocate - K B RATHOD
-
2.PATEL CHIRAG @ BHAJJI BHAGABHAI DHULABHAI
-
3.RATHOD RAVINDRASINH SOMSINH
-
4.CHAUHAN UPENDRASINH @ PINTUBHA KIRTISINH NATHUSINH
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
01-Apr-2026
Judegement
Summary: The court acquitted all four accused in this criminal case involving allegations of assault and rash/negligent driving. The judgment found that the prosecution failed to establish the elements of the charges under IPC sections 279, 304-A, 337, 323, 114, and 135 beyond reasonable doubt. The court noted that while witnesses provided statements, critical evidence was lacking—including proof of rash or negligent driving, the vehicle's involvement, and the accused's direct participation. Additionally, the fact that complainants later settled disputes amicably with the accused further undermined the prosecution's case. Consequently, the accused were acquitted of all charges. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
01-Apr-2026
Disposed
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
10-Mar-2026
Process To Accused
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
11-Feb-2026
Process To Accused
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
12-Jan-2026
Process To Accused
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
15-Dec-2025
Process To Accused
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
29-Sep-2025
Process To Accused
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
29-Jul-2025
Process To Accused
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
09-Jul-2025
Process To Accused
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
28-May-2025
Process To Accused
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
05-May-2025
Process To Accused
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
05-Mar-2025
Process To Accused
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
10-Feb-2025
Process To Accused
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
04-Dec-2024
Process To Accused
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
18-Oct-2024
Process To Accused
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
02-Sep-2024
Process To Accused
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
02-Jul-2024
Process To Accused
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
04-May-2024
Process To Accused
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
15-Mar-2024
Process To Accused
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
05-Feb-2024
Process To Accused
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
19-Dec-2023
Process To Accused
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
04-Nov-2023
Process To Accused
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
20-Sep-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
24-Aug-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 1212/2023
Summary: The court acquitted all four accused in this criminal case involving allegations of assault and rash/negligent driving. The judgment found that the prosecution failed to establish the elements of the charges under IPC sections 279, 304-A, 337, 323, 114, and 135 beyond reasonable doubt. The court noted that while witnesses provided statements, critical evidence was lacking—including proof of rash or negligent driving, the vehicle's involvement, and the accused's direct participation. Additionally, the fact that complainants later settled disputes amicably with the accused further undermined the prosecution's case. Consequently, the accused were acquitted of all charges. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts