Government of Gujarat vs VAGHARI KIRITBHAI MADHABHAI — 975/2025
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prevention of Gambling Act, 1887 Section 12. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJMH070014242025
Filing Number
975/2025
Filing Date
22-Jul-2025
Registration No
975/2025
Registration Date
22-Jul-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, VIJAPUR
Judge
1-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY
Last updated 16-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11206076250125
Police Station
VASAI POLICE STATION- MEHSANA DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.VAGHARI KIRITBHAI MADHABHAI
-
2.VAGHARI LALABHAI RAMESHBHAI
-
3.VAGHARI KISHANBHAI BACHUBHAI
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
The court convicted three accused persons under IPC Section 12 for gambling and sentenced each to a fine of ₹600 (or 15 days simple imprisonment in default), considering their poor economic status, first-time offence, and family dependence as mitigating factors. The judgment applied established sentencing principles to impose reduced punishment while maintaining deterrence and justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
09-Mar-2026
Process To Accused
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
31-Jan-2026
Process To Accused
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
17-Dec-2025
Process To Accused
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
18-Nov-2025
Process To Accused
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
15-Oct-2025
Process To Accused
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
26-Aug-2025
Process To Accused
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
22-Aug-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
22-Jul-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 975/2025
The court convicted three accused persons under IPC Section 12 for gambling and sentenced each to a fine of ₹600 (or 15 days simple imprisonment in default), considering their poor economic status, first-time offence, and family dependence as mitigating factors. The judgment applied established sentencing principles to impose reduced punishment while maintaining deterrence and justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts